manimanc
Well-Known Member
Standard from sky.I caught Reddy saying that the charges don't relate to breaking FFP rules but PL rules without highlighting which rules have been broken, with a tone that we're guilty because we've been accused.
Standard from sky.I caught Reddy saying that the charges don't relate to breaking FFP rules but PL rules without highlighting which rules have been broken, with a tone that we're guilty because we've been accused.
Surely!Indeed the sentiment is spot on but, we take the piss out of other teams stuff with shit grammar & spelling.
Shirley it could have been proof read.
If you asked Reddy which rules we've broken she wouldn't have a clue.I caught Reddy saying that the charges don't relate to breaking FFP rules but PL rules without highlighting which rules have been broken, with a tone that we're guilty because we've been accused.
I'm not too sure if you've missed the impact of shirley?Surely!
Licences.
I’m here to help.As regular as closkwork.
Martin Lipton making stuff up, surely not....
David Bernstein GB news- FFP is not competative and is punishing clubs such as Manchester City and Newcastle,it needs an ovehaul, to much power in the PL which is not distributed equally
Wow, somebody at last saying it as they see it.Don’t know if anyone has already posted this but here is an alternative view from, of all places, The Sun.
![]()
City owners arguably the most loved in football, jealous rivals should pipe down
IT HAS always been the most tribal of sports. One where the mood of an entire week can be shaped by 90 minutes. Eternally driven by emotion. And over the past few days we have had further proof of …www.thesun.co.uk
i.e. a bent cartelDavid Bernstein GB news- FFP is not competative and is punishing clubs such as Manchester City and Newcastle,it needs an ovehaul, to much power in the PL which is not distributed equally
My recollection is that:
Fordham (or whatever the name was at the time) paid City XX million for the image rights, giving an immediate boost to our figures. I think it was about 25-30M, which was a big percentage of the club income.
Image rights then were handled by Fordham in their entirety - PB has said earlier (I think I have this right) that image rights aren't wages, and the club don't have to include them.
The trouble is that Fordham are an ADUG company, and as no-one had done this before in English football, it could be viewed as owner investment, or exceeding fair value. I don't know if it's known what the repayment plan was, if any.
What ended up happening was that UEFA changed the rules of what was covered by FFP, and the revised version included related companies like Fordham; City brought the rights back in-house and collapsed the company.
I don't know how it feeds into the charges.
I don’t think emails sent by a few fans will have any bearing on the proceedings or on our barrister’s caseNo-one should be sending those quotes to any MPs if they have an interest in presenting a view of corruption in the game as in any way credible - the full quotes aren’t true, and will only give credence to the idea neither side on this debate has a grip of the facts!
I don’t think emails sent by a few fans will have any bearing on the proceedings or on our barrister’s case
The very same clubsI hope you're thinking about the same clubs that I am.
City have baulked at several deals recently due to what they see as unreasonable transfer fees, agents fees, wages or a combination of these.
Off the top of my head Cucurella, Maguire, Fred, Sanchez and I suspect many others too.
Jordan would know all about a clubs demise after he almost sent Palace under and lost a fortune of his own money doing so.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day but I wouldn't give Jordan any credence with his track record in football ownership.
Sounds about right, she could have phrased it more in her style “Dem people is guilty of no not wot, but know dem done it”!I caught Reddy saying that the charges don't relate to breaking FFP rules but PL rules without highlighting which rules have been broken, with a tone that we're guilty because we've been accused.
I don’t think emails sent by a few fans will have any bearing on the proceedings or on our barrister’s case
Pep should wear this to his next presser.
Have it under his zipped up hoody.
Reveal it at the first perpetuated lie.
View attachment 68904
