johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,466
Said it before, I’ll say it again: it needs an apostrophe before “cause” (to denote omission/ contraction of the word “because”).
Said it before, I’ll say it again: it needs an apostrophe before “cause” (to denote omission/ contraction of the word “because”).
But I did, just ‘cause I could.Trust me, the banner was perfectly fine.
You shouldn't have used a comma, btw ;)
So who did write it, because that is libellous.
I can't state this any stronger but FUCK SIMON JORDAN.
Martin Lipton making stuff up, surely not....
I'm pretty certain it was the PL who errored in their press release as they later quietly changed the release to the correct rule numbers, if it was everyone else misreading it I doubt they would have changed it.The PL handbook changes each season and the number of a rule one season can be totally different another season so no it wasnt the PL who errored on this it was those of us who assumed consistency of rule number
Is the correct answer.Is the correct answer
I'm pretty certain it was the PL who errored in their press release as they later quietly changed the release to the correct rule numbers, if it was everyone else misreading it I doubt they would have changed it.
I do think that's pretty irrelevant though, the people actually running the case aren't the same people writing the press releases so all the legal documents will be correct (you'd hope).
It does show a degree of sloppiness though, you'd think for such an unprecedented statement someone from the legal team would have had a bit of a proofread.