PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[whipper]

His latest column put down yesterday was a classic.

Said Liverpool fans shouldn't be congratulating themselves on the Paris/Uefa verdict when they scarred a teenage City girl fan for life just a few weeks ago.

Bet he has close protection now, after that.

 

[Rory Bluelow]

The MEN think it’s okay to leave comments like this up.

Quite shocking comment that.

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

Quite shocking comment that.

It’s racist, ignorant and disgusting but the sad thing is, I don’t find it the slightest bit shocking given the intolerant world we live in these days.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

View attachment 69780

The draft rule change is already written.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Bet he has close protection now, after that.

Had to quit the Merseyside patch after 20 years. Poor sod had a target on his back which was made even bigger when Klopp went full cult and banned The Sun from Klanfield.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

No editor worth their salt would ignore concrete evidence of corruption when it comes to officiating.

They know if they don't run it, someone else will.

A story such as the one being claimed tells its own story.

The best ones.

Do you not think editors can be swayed by external influences?

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Do you not think editors can be swayed by external influences?

Of course, but a story will always come out. Certainly one that nobody would dare ignore.

 

[pavelsrnicek]

I have to say the whole recording that City may have is not directly relevant to our situation with the charges as far as I can see it. If it’s true the Premier League will have some serious questions to answer. However we are facing some serious charges from the league and I think the recording is a sideshow that’s unlikely to result in any charges being dropped without infinity more question being asked of the Premier League.

 

[Keeper!]

I have to say the whole recording that City may have is not directly relevant to our situation with the charges as far as I can see it. If it’s true the Premier League will have some serious questions to answer. However we are facing some serious charges from the league and I think the recording is a sideshow that’s unlikely to result in any charges being dropped without infinity more question being asked of the Premier League.

These rumours are doing us no favours whatsoever, in fact I would say the opposite.

Keep the conspiracy theories to the idiots, just show our irrefutable evidence and get the monkey off our back once and forever!

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Of course, but a story will always come out. Certainly one that nobody would dare ignore.

Can an organisation not file for a super injunction even if the press actually wanted to run with a story like this or does a SI have to be from an individual?