PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I think our defence to the charges brought by PL must be to prove that these charges are as was once said, "completely untrue". No defence can possibly be based on an argument that we were pushed into breaking the law (of the land, made by a sovereign Parliament) because we are charged by a corrupt PL. Our "irrefutable evidence" will certainly be irrefutable if it shows us to be innocent. If the club wishes to/can go on to claim that the charges are part of a "bigger picture" which shows that these charges are part of a bigger picture which is of a PL and other bodies which have abdicated their roles as regulatory bodies to act in the interests of interested parties then that would help cleanse the game of much that is wrong. But, the club must have weighty evidence to back up these claims. And it would be no use, for instance, introducing an "independent" regulator if this was just a vehicle for Stretford or Merseyside key board fans.
This is kinda where my hopes and expectations lie.
I trust the club. I think winning is a mammoth task, not that I believe we are guilty, but without getting this into a court of law, the balance of probabilities is to low a bar for the PL to have to prove.

I do want our management to have definitive proof that puts this to bed for good and the only way I can think of is, that in doing so, whatever we have up our sleeve genuinely puts the PL’s regulation of the game in question. In effect forcing a change in either regulation or the governance of same.
 
Strange how not even one syllable has been said about the ongoing saga between us and premier league, nothing, nada, nish.
It's watertight. And so it should be.

Usually something gets out but not one of the sour **** twitter journalists have got a sniff.

They aren't even making anything up, not a peep.
 
I know for a fact that a well-known journalist at one of the so-called 'quality' papers was handed a dossier showing incontrovertible evidence of corruption at PGMOL and wouldn't publish it.

They've all got their snouts in the trough and if you upset the apple cart the trough runs dry.
That’s more of an accusation than Dodge’s revelation.
Do tell.
 
Worrall should have been sent off in the first half, but I am not blaming the ref for the dropped points
It was at the far end from where we were stood so will take your word for it.
I can’t really remember a potential red card incident but then I was standing next to a merry small claims solicitor
 
Nothing to do with not liking City. It was around 10 years ago for a start so well before the Pep era. I think it was just before we won the first PL title in 2012.

Maybe he was warned off, as most journalists were by Abramovich. Don't forget that the FA/PL successfully hushed up criminal behaviour by Liverpool, over the illegal access to our data.
I thought the Liverpool hacking was later. Not related obviously?
 
Strange how not even one syllable has been said about the ongoing saga between us and premier league, nothing, nada, nish.
It's watertight. And so it should be.

Usually something gets out but not one of the sour **** twitter journalists have got a sniff.

They aren't even making anything up, not a peep.
Fear perhaps?
 
Can we not play it (if it does exist) as the players come onto the pitch at home games instead of that noisy version of Blue Moon.
It might gee them up a tad more
 
You read the stats with rags games, in a lot of them the ref will book the other teams defenders early, almost putting them on the back foot early on.
Graham Poll said something in his book along the lines of he used to get an email telling him how to ref the match at the rags in favour of them as they didn't want to upset taggart.

I'm 99.9% sure he mentions it in his book, will have to look for a link for it.

Edit..
Found this.

Remember a game refereed by Poll at Maine Road which was both diabolical and very clever at the same time. It was towards the end of the season City were just safe from relegation and Arsenal were pushing for a European spot. The difference in quality between the teams was such that it didn't need any help from the referee for Arsenal to win. However, for the early part of the first half 2 or 3 City players were booked for something and nothing. Arsenal were given soft free kicks when they lost the ball in attacking positions; City were given free kicks when they had retained the ball and were breaking from defensive positions. With about 15 minutes to go with the match won for Arsenal 2 or 3 Arsenal players were booked to even up the statistics.
No major controversial decisions but lots of little thing given against City.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.