mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
This is kinda where my hopes and expectations lie.I think our defence to the charges brought by PL must be to prove that these charges are as was once said, "completely untrue". No defence can possibly be based on an argument that we were pushed into breaking the law (of the land, made by a sovereign Parliament) because we are charged by a corrupt PL. Our "irrefutable evidence" will certainly be irrefutable if it shows us to be innocent. If the club wishes to/can go on to claim that the charges are part of a "bigger picture" which shows that these charges are part of a bigger picture which is of a PL and other bodies which have abdicated their roles as regulatory bodies to act in the interests of interested parties then that would help cleanse the game of much that is wrong. But, the club must have weighty evidence to back up these claims. And it would be no use, for instance, introducing an "independent" regulator if this was just a vehicle for Stretford or Merseyside key board fans.
I trust the club. I think winning is a mammoth task, not that I believe we are guilty, but without getting this into a court of law, the balance of probabilities is to low a bar for the PL to have to prove.
I do want our management to have definitive proof that puts this to bed for good and the only way I can think of is, that in doing so, whatever we have up our sleeve genuinely puts the PL’s regulation of the game in question. In effect forcing a change in either regulation or the governance of same.