Eric Hitchmough
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 2,915
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
But was even alleged to have happened I don’t remember even a brief mentionIt became chip paper!
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
We might hear something later next week with regards the make up of the panel.
Fingers crossed.
Fingers crossed.
Kazzydeyna
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 3,007
Is what you’re hearing about the panel make up, good or bad news for city? Or neutral?We might hear something later next week with regards the make up of the panel.
Fingers crossed.
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
Is what you’re hearing about the panel make up, good or bad news for city? Or neutral?
I don't think anyone would know that mate!
abu13
Well-Known Member
Gill. Moores and Levy no doubt :)We might hear something later next week with regards the make up of the panel.
Fingers crossed.
Can you clarify this for me who is the they you are referring to and where has the falsifying accounts part come from I thought the Premier League said they had not accused us of such things as fraud and false accounting even tho I suspect they have by default due to what would have had to happen for the charges to be true.And it's also important to point out that our accounts, and any supporting documents, form the basis for whether we've complied with the PL's Sustainability rules and FFP.
I suspect the fact that any under or overstatement of our financial position still wouldn't actually have led to a breach in either case is likely to be irrelevant. If they find us guilty of falsifying our accounts then the PL/FFP charges pretty well automatically stand as well.
On the other hand, if they find that we haven't falsified our accounts then the chances are that the PL/FFP charges fall by default.
I read your post and thought we where being gone after by the police and HMRC etc etc but I carnt see it
Mid Wales blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,771
It’s been so long since I read it, I’ve forgotten what they were supposed to have done. It was part of the DS release that was printed over the week.But was even alleged to have happened I don’t remember even a brief mention
As I said, chip paper the next day.
eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 8,015
- Team supported
- Manchester city
Seems to me that your post is inferring quite a bit of back peddling from the Premier League.Can you clarify this for me who is the they you are referring to and where has the falsifying accounts part come from I thought the Premier League said they had not accused us of such things as fraud and false accounting even tho I suspect they have by default due to what would have had to happen for the charges to be true.
I read your post and thought we where being gone after by the police and HMRC etc etc but I carnt see it
Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
Interview with Cheesman here.
This is what City are up against (the aptly named cartel) and have been for a long time now.
City have attempted to level up the playing field, to keep the competition honest (which is in the interests of all other clubs btw).
Yes, there was a wobble (the ESL temptation) but it looks like the club have learnt a lesson from that.
So, no matter what, In City (and Pep)! I Trust.