jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,854
These are things that Harris would know if he had any kind of genuine expertise in his professed specialist area, so his errors speak volumes. And he then goes on, later in the discussion, to retort in the manner shown in the tweet below. I'd regard those responses as lame even if they came from a child.
The whole dialogue between the two of them reads like exactly what it is: an exchange between, on the one hand, a serious professional person who's eminent in his field and knows what he's talking about (Stefan), and, on the other hand, a bad-faith fucking simpleton (Harris).
EDIT - To make crystal clear which is which, though I hope people realised anyway! ;)
Harris's tweets today are very reminiscent of Delooney when Stefan pointed out the time-barred issues in relation to the CAS case. Impenetrable was the word he used at the time. Anything which requires them to put their personal bitterness to one side and engaged in reasoned thought is "impenetrable" to them.