citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,063
I know mate.That is how CAS actually presented them. Not that we were guilty but exempt because they were time barred, but purely, that there was no need to even look at them because of the time limitations and they were therefore irrelevant. Which you can just as easily say we were prevented from proving innocence, because of the time bar.
My point was the media ran with 'would have been guilty' but for the time-barring, rather then 'why did they charge them for time-barred periods?'