You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Audrey is fecal?It's the English translation of the latin phrase they used to have on their club badge, Audere Est Facere.
crazyg
Well-Known Member
Don't talk shit.Audrey is fecal?
;-)
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
I thought our owner Sheikh M bailed out Barclay's Bank with a multi billion pound loan that got repaid with plenty of interest.Correct
As the dippers were saved from administration by a loan from Barclays who at the time were owned by the UK taxpayer, does this mean they are state sponsored too?
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Have to agree on the levy thing,what actual power does this weasel hold,I’d totally get it if his team were up challenging for trophies,but no disrespect he’s as about important as chairmen in teams in Outer Mongolia,if he is welding any sort of influence it’s absolutely staggering ..If the Levy thing is true and I don't doubt it at all - what does that say about the PL - being bullied by one of their less successful members to try to bring down the club that has provided the largest contribution to their product. I can't get my head around why any sensible organisation would do that. It seems to suggest to me that they have no long-term strategy. An organisation that was in touch with the market would see the long term benefits of City becoming more and more attractive. The failure to understand the changing nature of their commercial environment will threaten their future and they have all sorts of things to fear like the super league and more fans realising that they are backing losers (redtops) - or am I putting too much faith in people being able to comprehend what is going on?
A career in journalism awaits for you my friend ;)Simples. It's Latin.
Todo means all
Todare means failure.
All is failure = Spursey.
(I made the second one up. So sue me)
Millennium
Well-Known Member
I'm tired of Simon Jordan's constant negative comments, attack on Manchester City, and most recently on Pep for the asking to speed up the legal process.
I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).
Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.
I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).
Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,982
Have to agree on the levy thing,what actual power does this weasel hold,I’d totally get it if his team were up challenging for trophies,but no disrespect he’s as about important as chairmen in teams in Outer Mongolia,if he is welding any sort of influence it’s absolutely staggering ..
Levy = plausible deniability for the redshirts.
Or just simple deniable plausibility, I suppose.
You never tried it?Who the hell puts a frozen rabbit in their headlights? You wouldn't be able to see anything.
They eat carrots, so can see in the dark, therefore, you wouldn’t need the headlights
That’s not entirely true. He sits on the board of the ECA, so whilst he may not carry much power, he carries an awful lot of influenceHave to agree on the levy thing,what actual power does this weasel hold,I’d totally get it if his team were up challenging for trophies,but no disrespect he’s as about important as chairmen in teams in Outer Mongolia,if he is welding any sort of influence it’s absolutely staggering ..