PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

These charges were announced 4 months ago, The Premier League doesn’t have confidence to enforce its own rule book so is appointing a judiciary panel to see the evidence and reach a verdict. They’ve sat on this so called evidence for over 3 years whilst City have won 3 premier league trophies in that time.

They can’t investigate and are not confident in reaching a verdict themselves in a timely manner. So they have to get someone else in to do it, are they not too confident of the case they have?

The recent news that City have pushed back on the charges and that it will take 2 to 4 years shows what a farce this all is. This doesn’t make the Premier League fit for purpose as a sporting body. If the time scales do go out to 4 years, the club and the Premier League will be arguing over accounts and incidents that will be nearly 20 years old. It’s not a witch hunt and we are all paranoid aren’t we?
 
Apparently he's the perfect example of cheap overseas labor.

If NYTimes really wanted reputable journalists with degrees in economics.. they'd hire someone qualified and American but instead they went for cheap labor that provides more click bait with misleading sensational headlines.
The unfortunate thing is that none of the media are interested in accuracy whether financial or otherwise.

As you say click bait rather than a need for correct info.
 
These charges were announced 4 months ago, The Premier League doesn’t have confidence to enforce its own rule book so is appointing a judiciary panel to see the evidence and reach a verdict. They’ve sat on this so called evidence for over 3 years whilst City have won 3 premier league trophies in that time.

They can’t investigate and are not confident in reaching a verdict themselves in a timely manner. So they have to get someone else in to do it, are they not too confident of the case they have?

The recent news that City have pushed back on the charges and that it will take 2 to 4 years shows what a farce this all is. This doesn’t make the Premier League fit for purpose as a sporting body. If the time scales do go out to 4 years, the club and the Premier League will be arguing over accounts and incidents that will be nearly 20 years old. It’s not a witch hunt and we are all paranoid aren’t we?
I'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!
 
Apologies if there are other issues which I am sure you can tell us about?
He’s a rag shithouse?

How anyone from Manchester can countenance working for that shitty-arsed fucking paper - after they wantonly and for their own financial gain revealed the details of the Manchester arena bombing when specifically asked not to by every relevant authority - is way beyond me. This panja individual clearly has no moral compass at all. Maybe he was involved, the disgusting fucking twat.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.