feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Frank Sinatra didn’t have us in any form to compete, City were a money pit at the time which John Wardle had to bail him out of. Why would the premier league be interested in anything like that?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Frank Sinatra didn’t have us in any form to compete, City were a money pit at the time which John Wardle had to bail him out of. Why would the premier league be interested in anything like that?
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Exactly. Which kind of backs up the point that this is a witch hunt, pure and simple!Frank Sinatra didn’t have us in any form to compete, City were a money pit at the time which John Wardle had to bail him out of. Why would the premier league be interested in anything like that?
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,086
Apologies if there are other issues which I am sure you can tell us about?
Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
I thought there was some reference to Panja specifically as one of the recipients of leaked information from UEFA on our defense of the original charges against us. Which then led to our "non-co-operation" with the enquiry and subsequent fine.
Dinas
Well-Known Member
Ironically, these are very serious issues which is just what any governing body should be interested in. Instead they look for historical infringements in our accounts which is not tackling the real problem - we all know that. An independent regulatory body is appealing - but what's to say these devious 'history' (we do it the right way) clubs will not 'capture' the regulator and still be the real force behind the scenes. It happens in many industries which are regulated like water for instance. If, as we think, these charges are empty of any substance and simply designed to protect the cartel - I really hope this message will be delivered to the industry and the fans - but cynically I suspect it will somehow be kept under wraps. It's shameful that they have deliberately besmirched our name and tried to undermine our achievements and also that so many resources, on all sides, have been devoted to such a hideous strategy. Those resources could have been put to much more effective use.Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
We weren't destroying the cartel thenI'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Thanks mate, sorry but didn't know the link you describe.Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
however I'm sure there are many reasons for the media to interpret the news the way they want rather than have old fashioned editorials that originally reflected political allegeance.
Who would have thpught it, cut out news and present your interpretation of it as the news with bias or even lies.
1. Not qualified for Euro comps then, so UEFA uninterested, even had they launched ffp earlier.I'm still astonished that the charges only go back to just after the ADUG takeover. Are the PL saying that we were completely squeaky clean when Doctor Death owned the club?!
2. Prem league had few, if any, financial regs then.
Parry was a go to contact of Panja when he was the NW Football correspondent of MEN(?)Oh, I thought everyone knew of the links between Fenway and the NYT, and the (admittedly alleged, because it wasn't properly investigated) flow of information on the 2018 investigation from UEFA executives to Panja through the NYT (if you want a name, allegedly, Parry who was "promoted" to the EFL shortly after).
Keith Moon
Well-Known Member
Wasn't he known as Gills bum boy?Parry was a go to contact of Panja when he was the NW Football correspondent of MEN(?)