They haven’t got any evidence. It would be gleefully all over the media if they had. These fools have never been able to keep anything quiet.Have the PL given us details yet? They are supposed to disclose exactly what we are charged with and the evidence therefor.
If they reply: “e-mails” I expect our brief to laugh his cock off. ( A repeat of CAS)They haven’t got any evidence. It would be gleefully all over the media if they had. These fools have never been able to keep anything quiet.
If this were a proper Court, I’d agree. In this case though the prosecution have picked the judge……If they reply: “e-mails” I expect our brief to laugh his cock off. ( A repeat of CAS)
I agree - I made a similar point recently. If we've fiddled the books, that is not a PL rules issue, it would be a criminal offence leaving executives liable to prosecution and potentially imprisonment. Which is why I cannot believe we have done anything other than "creative accounting" - fully legal creative accounting - at most.I am still at a loss with this though. IF what they are accusing us of is true then we have committed some very serious offences, fraud being just one, and not minor fraud either. Our accountants would have to be complicit and all those ramifications. IF these are true then why aren’t HMRC and police involved and dawn raids on the Etihad?? A mystery.
I am still at a loss with this though. IF what they are accusing us of is true then we have committed some very serious offences, fraud being just one, and not minor fraud either. Our accountants would have to be complicit and all those ramifications. IF these are true then why aren’t HMRC and police involved and dawn raids on the Etihad?? A mystery.