PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[bobbyowenquiff]

Unfortunately, that is not case. The burden of proof on this could well be on City (I think the difference comes if the accusation becomes fraud which it could well be). It is not always the accuser who has to prove guilt.

My point is that the people on the independent panel, whilst not being unjust or corrupt they still have a slight side.

This is not a court and the panel are not there free of charge (paid by PL).

In work I have experience of this, one where I am on the board and we refer matters to an independent panel that we present to a long with the other party.

I have no doubt the integrity of the parties to make the correct decision.

However, there are small differences in us using our independent party to a truly independent party, not saying it would change the verdict but they are little differences you know from that situation.

The PL will have to provide evidence to support their allegations. They can't just pluck them out of thin air. They are serious allegations.

 

[Jesus H Gabz]

I look at the etisalat deal as Khaldoon setting off a little wind up mouse for the press & authorities to chase around while we go about our business

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

The PL will have to provide evidence to support their allegations. They can't just pluck them out of thin air. They are serious allegations.

They have to prove them, although the burden of proof will be lower than in a criminal court.

 

[leo_city]

Ultimately it seems they want to charge us with something and make sure whatever it is some or a lot of those charges stand. Just depends on what the consequences are.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

I’m the shadowy figure from The UAE who gave city 30 million.

No, I’m the shadowy figure from The UAE who gave City 30 million.

 

[leo_city]

It’s bizarre it’s made out to be a pre-determined consequence and we’re made to understand charges one by one lol

 

[Damanino]

Arsenal agree fee with WHU for a record fee for a british player, rags agree fee for Mount, and "new allegations against state owned City" and dragging us through the mud for the millionth time.

just a short summary of today sport news.

also on a different level the media fawning over Arteta, even crediting him of a great job by spending 100s of millions on signings and rebuilding Arsenal while winning nothing, while giving Pep zero credit for success and football created this country hasnt seen before shows us everything we need to know of media bias and racism.

 

[deano ou812]

They have to prove them, although the burden of proof will be lower than in a criminal court.

They’ll probably produce the cut and pasted e-mails that uefa used at CAS ;-)

 

[bobmcfc]

They have to prove them, although the burden of proof will be lower than in a criminal court.

I saw this relating to those payments

 

[cookster]

They have to prove them, although the burden of proof will be lower than in a criminal court.

If they're essential saying we committed accounting fraud isn't that burden higher?