PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Mcfc1.9.8.0]

Why is Mike keegan saying this is a new charge on top of the 115

 

[ZanteWeatherman]

Honestly, anyone who can’t see what our enemies/rivals are doing is beyond fucking hope. It’s glaringly obvious.

Seriously, the time must be coming where the club "step up" and silence these chancers with libel action. Alleged journalists and their editors who fuck with their nonsensical rubbish to maximise hatred and tribalism.

 

[ZanteWeatherman]

I gave Arsenal £15mill so they could put a third and winning bid in for Rice.

That aside, I fucking hate football journalists. They have made a living out of lying, being two faced bastards, and have shame whatsoever.

I dropped half a crown on the Kippax in 1976, that was surely the springboard to our current success. I'm available to be interviewed under oath........................

 

[ZanteWeatherman]

Why is Mike keegan saying this is a new charge on top of the 115

If that is what he is alluding to, it is surely because he's a grasping, clueless and completely stupid idiot who needs clicks to pay his leccy bill. Ha ha ha. he is a plank.

 

[halfcenturyup]

So another big, fat nothing burger?

Etisalat was described pretty completely in the CAS award and, as far as I am aware, the facts aren't disputed. There is no mystery to me, other than why the club felt compelled to record the money from ADUG as a reduction of the receivable from Etisalat rather than through a current account from ADUG.

As far as I am aware, short-term funding and its repayment is allowed by FFP, so I am not even sure what the actual issue is.

There is no impact on the true and fair view given by the accounts due to the treatment of the Etisalat sponsorship. So that goes right of the window on day one. The rest is for lawyers to argue over. Fraud? Deliberate concealment? Good luck proving that when we can roll-out a dozen witnesses who were involved explaining why what happened happened the way it did. Would be a foolhardy panel to say all those witnesses were lying when the only evidence they have is a couple of "out of context" emails.

Maybe the PL is hoping the club will settle so everyone can say we were found guilty. I am not sure Mansour and Khaldoon are in the mood for that.

 

[eyalluvitt]

If Piers Morgan told me his real name is Piers Morgan I still wouldn’t believe him, he’s no credibility whatsoever, just an egotistical prick who supports a failing football team, what a ****.

PiersMorganisaC@nt.com should be our shirt sponsor next season in a 4 billion one season deal paid in crypto currency via the Cayman Islands

 

[SilverFox2]

It’s all to keep the narrative going from these American owners New York Times a kunt of a paper

I'm sure our American owners are quietly smug regarding their flourishing investment at City.

 

[SilverFox2]

So another big, fat nothing burger?

Etisalat was described pretty completely in the CAS award and, as far as I am aware, the facts aren't disputed. There is no mystery to me, other than why the club felt compelled to record the money from ADUG as a reduction of the receivable from Etisalat rather than through a current account from ADUG.

As far as I am aware, short-term funding and its repayment is allowed by FFP, so I am not even sure what the actual issue is.

There is no impact on the true and fair view given by the accounts due to the treatment of the Etisalat sponsorship. So that goes right of the window on day one. The rest is for lawyers to argue over. Fraud? Deliberate concealment? Good luck proving that when we can roll-out a dozen witnesses who were involved explaining why what happened happened the way it did. Would be a foolhardy panel to say all those witnesses were lying when the only evidence they have is a couple of "out of context" emails.

Maybe the PL is hoping the club will settle so everyone can say we were found guilty. I am not sure Mansour and Khaldoon are in the mood for that.

Do you think that our owners will review the reasons for our dominence last season and conclude that the combo may not have happened without the PL charges?

In other words from an investment point of view is there a benefit in being demonized by all and sundry?

We seem to be forcing rivals to spend at a time their brand superiority has plumeted.

Forgetting FFP simply from an accountancy point of view they are struggling financially.

 

[roach3]

Why doesn't the club defend itself more and
Start going after these cunts for defamation of
character.
Start banning some of these fuckers from the ethihad. Do something fffs.

I’ve been saying this for ages
Doesn’t need to be everyone just one big hitter putting em out of business
That would be a warning to the rest.

 

[J.G.Blue.]

Sorry to say it really does look like we are guilty,
Just happened to hear the world renowned footballing intellectual Shebahn Aherne (no me neither?) on Talkshite radio this morning saying "Regarding Man Citys charges, its obvious there can be no smoke without fire"
Case closed I think, take the points and the titles away, and relegate us now & as a club we are very, very sorry.