gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I am well aware of what he was implying, but thanks for the English comprehension lesson, nonetheless.I think you've minimised the import of his comments. It's implying that if we are found not to have broken the rules then it's because the rules were not enforced.
I’ve not minimised his comments at all. I’ve chosen to point to his pitiful deployment of legalese to deprecate his capacity to opine on the subject. He pontificates with an authority that his understanding manifestly does not warrant.
I’ve neutralised his comments so there is nothing worthwhile left to minimise.