PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I think you've minimised the import of his comments. It's implying that if we are found not to have broken the rules then it's because the rules were not enforced.
I am well aware of what he was implying, but thanks for the English comprehension lesson, nonetheless.

I’ve not minimised his comments at all. I’ve chosen to point to his pitiful deployment of legalese to deprecate his capacity to opine on the subject. He pontificates with an authority that his understanding manifestly does not warrant.

I’ve neutralised his comments so there is nothing worthwhile left to minimise.
 
I am well aware of what he was implying, but thanks for the English comprehension lesson, nonetheless.

I’ve not minimised his comments at all. I’ve chosen to point to his pitiful deployment of legalese to deprecate his capacity to opine on the subject. He pontificates with an authority that his understanding manifestly does not warrant.

I’ve neutralised his comments so there is nothing worthwhile left to minimise.

That may be true; you've missed out that he's a **** though.
 
I am well aware of what he was implying, but thanks for the English comprehension lesson, nonetheless.

I’ve not minimised his comments at all. I’ve chosen to point to his pitiful deployment of legalese to deprecate his capacity to opine on the subject. He pontificates with an authority that his understanding manifestly does not warrant.

I’ve neutralised his comments so there is nothing worthwhile left to minimise.
I do love your 'drop the mic' posts GDM :)
 
He couldn’t resist mentioning the 115 charges on talkshite on cup final day. He was taking some rags down apparently to the game, I’m sure they didn’t make him.
I heard the section on TS that your referring to - Just how self-important was he that he was taking some of the poor down to London in his big posh car?
 
I am well aware of what he was implying, but thanks for the English comprehension lesson, nonetheless.

I’ve not minimised his comments at all. I’ve chosen to point to his pitiful deployment of legalese to deprecate his capacity to opine on the subject. He pontificates with an authority that his understanding manifestly does not warrant.

I’ve neutralised his comments so there is nothing worthwhile left to minimise.
That's brilliant. And god I love it when you talk dirty :O)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.