PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Tell that to Leicester, pre-takeover Newcastle and many others. Owner sponsorship isn't against FFP. Why should it be as long as it is at fair value?
But our owner isn't supposed to own our sponsors.

There's little logic to it, and it has been suggested that if some of these sponsorships were considered related parties City wouldn't have had any ffp problems. Once they are considered unrelated though, the sponsorship can't be funded by the owner.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.