It’s politics based.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,984
To the politics threads ......It’s politics based.
The income and the investment are the same as the income is disguised equity investment from the ownerIs it? I thought it was just losses and (now) wages and amortisation that were controlled?
I also thought the whole premise of the PL is that if the amounts are considered "disguised equity funding" then we fail FFP on the amount of losses we would have made without the income, not on the extra amount of investment.
Or do I have that wrong?
Asa's left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 3,986
- Location
- Sandbach via Rusholme
- Team supported
- Some team in the CFG
Just read an article on a Gooner website that came up on Newsnow. It's a reasonable article, and you can tell he thinks we're upto no good, but he stopped short of saying it. But his main premise was that it was all about tax on add ons and when they were due. I'm sure it's a concern, but I think we all could have a better guess based on the number of charges and it's not, at the moment, a HMRC issue.
Not sure the reference, but I can't stand that cnut!!!'As It Was'? That Harry Styles cove gets everywhere, doesn't he..?!
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Your bar must be considerably lower than mine if that's your definition of "reasonable" ;)Just read an article on a Gooner website that came up on Newsnow. It's a reasonable article, and you can tell he thinks we're upto no good, but he stopped short of saying it. But his main premise was that it was all about tax on add ons and when they were due. I'm sure it's a concern, but I think we all could have a better guess based on the number of charges and it's not, at the moment, a HMRC issue.
This whole saga has been heavily populated by people who think we are up to no good but who cannot produce a shred of evidence. Many of these are journalists who ought to know better. The trouble is they poison the pool and, especially where the so called independent tribunal is concerned, they start with a prejudiced view and our lawyers are almost forced to prove our innocence, rather than the burden being on the league.Just read an article on a Gooner website that came up on Newsnow. It's a reasonable article, and you can tell he thinks we're upto no good, but he stopped short of saying it. But his main premise was that it was all about tax on add ons and when they were due. I'm sure it's a concern, but I think we all could have a better guess based on the number of charges and it's not, at the moment, a HMRC issue.
Confused not see this suggested anywhere else and don’t see how there would be tax implications for add ons other than they reduce profit tax if paid. So if we had lots of add ons we would have less profit less tax but also more likely fail FFP if alleged proper journalists don’t understand FFP then I doubt some random Arsenal fan does I know I shouldn’t but I like to read what other people say about us even if it’s rubbish can you post a link so I can examine itJust read an article on a Gooner website that came up on Newsnow. It's a reasonable article, and you can tell he thinks we're upto no good, but he stopped short of saying it. But his main premise was that it was all about tax on add ons and when they were due. I'm sure it's a concern, but I think we all could have a better guess based on the number of charges and it's not, at the moment, a HMRC issue.
MillisleBlue
Well-Known Member
This whole saga has been heavily populated by people who think we are up to no good but who cannot produce a shred of evidence. Many of these are journalists who ought to know better. The trouble is they poison the pool and, especially where the so called independent tribunal is concerned, they start with a prejudiced view and our lawyers are almost forced to prove our innocence, rather than the burden being on the league.
Unless the key players have been living under a rock for the past 6 months, I don't see any chance of us getting a fair trial. Our combined enemies PR departments and their media whores have seen to that.
Asa's left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 3,986
- Location
- Sandbach via Rusholme
- Team supported
- Some team in the CFG
As you say 'Independent' lolThis whole saga has been heavily populated by people who think we are up to no good but who cannot produce a shred of evidence. Many of these are journalists who ought to know better. The trouble is they poison the pool and, especially where the so called independent tribunal is concerned, they start with a prejudiced view and our lawyers are almost forced to prove our innocence, rather than the burden being on the league.