PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[mancity2012_eamo]

F.O. to Embassy: “Have a quiet word with UAE and see if they are concerned about charges against City.”
Embassy to F.O.:”Wilko.”
Embassy to F.O.:”UAE say they have £30 billion concern and trust that uk gov will have a quiet word with the independent panel. Also, they have a ton of dirt about the redshirts.”

Have you seen leaked emails or someth?

 

[Centurions]

So after reading most of the posters on here we will be found not guilty of all charges against us or we will. I personally believe we will win hands down or not. So which is it ?

It could be middle for diddle?

 

[TonyM]

There's something fishy here.

Just had salmon for dinner.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

I believe that Hendrick is a blue.

Season ticket for decades.

 

[Ric]

Got to be honest, that’s not a good thing at all.

Sorry, what isn’t?

 

[meltonblue]

Sorry, what isn’t?

That it would be certain it would be brought up at a diplomatic level.

 

[Gordyola]

Yeah, but if the Abu Dhabi Government contacted the British government, in order to influence an ongoing investigation or to make it go away, then that doesn't look very good, does it?

Especially if we are adamant that City are not state owned, so why is the Abu Dhabi government getting involved in a football matter?

If the intention was to have their day in court, you wouldn't be knocking on the door of number 10, as some people on here have mentioned, threatening to cancel Billions of investment.

If that is the case, then the charges have to have some merit.

If
But
Not state owned check companies house

 

[remember arthur mann]

Yeah, but if the Abu Dhabi Government contacted the British government, in order to influence an ongoing investigation or to make it go away, then that doesn't look very good, does it?

Especially if we are adamant that City are not state owned, so why is the Abu Dhabi government getting involved in a football matter?

If the intention was to have their day in court, you wouldn't be knocking on the door of number 10, as some people on here have mentioned, threatening to cancel Billions of investment.

If that is the case, then the charges have to have some merit.

Only a rag ffs!!!

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

That it would be certain it would be brought up at a diplomatic level.

Depends what (if anything) was said.

If the AD government expressed concern about an AD owned UK business being treated unfairly then that is a standard way for any government to act. If, huge if, they threatened to withdraw billions in investment if the UK government didn't make it all go away then that is a totally different kettle of fish

 

[Gordyola]

For the Premier League, you mean. We don't know the content of the emails or discussions but the fact that the UAE government have seen fit to talk to the British government about this shows how serious they believe the accusations to be. In essence, a UK-based company is questioning the legitimacy of a company owned by prominent businessmen and political figures from the UAE and they're stepping in to find out why.

Where is the evidence that it has been discussed?
There isn’t any