100% bollocks. How often are sponsorships renewed with the existing sponsors? Are they expecting clubs to put it out to tender rather than continue with an acceptable deal between two entities who are quite happy with their arrangement?The more I think about it, the more I think this is made up bollocks. If you had to have multiple deals of the same value, sponsorship negotiations would amount to a public auction. The thing is, it could never be resolved because, by definition, the best offer could not be matched by multiple other offers.
The prospect of Poundland Haaland or Aussie Nunes with a gun is a bit scary. Target should be safe though.Just because two sponsors offer the same financial deal doesn't mean the deals are the same.
I cant wait for one of the America clubs to have a gun manufacturer as a sponsor. Both companies offering thr same financial but one gives the players a free AK47 !
Aussie Nunes ?The prospect of Poundland Haaland or Aussie Nunes with a gun is a bit scary. Target should be safe though.
Dyno-Rod and Rentokil.I'd love to see who was competing with Chevrolet and Teamviewer.
Some bloke called Nunes named after an Australian city. Though our Nunes hasn't hit the target yet.Aussie Nunes ?
They always try that.They’ll probably try to retroactively punish us for this too
I can't see how this proposed 'multiple' similar value offers rule could possibly work (even though I can see why it is being put forward). What major company / corporation would bother getting into substantive negotiations if they know that the club they are dealing with are doing the same with other parties? Also you have different perceived values for what is on offer. So as not to use us or Newcastle as an example how are Arsenal going to get multiple similar offers for stadium naming rights when the Emirates deal ends? It would clearly be far more valuable to Emirates to renew than say to B&M Bargains to be the new sponsor. The same applies to all PL clubs and major sponsorship deals.