PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Newman Noggs]

I'd love to see who was competing with Chevrolet and Teamviewer.

 

[wolviedinho]

View attachment 98282

We bribe companies anyway! No problem for mansour to get puma or Barclays or whomever to put together a fake bid and email it to the league. That is what we do anyway so should be experts at it by now -:)

 

[ganganvince]

View attachment 98282

So we have to give details to our rivals of sponsorship deals that are out there with the value?

 

[eastmanc]

Too late for us surely. Looks like they’re hell bent on putting the brakes on Newcastle though!

City were asked if Etihad was a related party to which City said they weren't. I thought this wasn't an issue.

 

[wolviedinho]

I'd love to see who was competing with Chevrolet and Teamviewer.

Siam!

Thailands premier waste disposal depot!

Go down well at that rag shithole -:)

 

[LongsightM13]

I'd love to see who was competing with Chevrolet and Teamviewer.

Haven’t both of the people who signed off on those deals been quietly sacked?
Chevrolet guy definitely
Obvious backhanders and corruption

 

[dadnlad]

City were asked if Etihad was a related party to which City said they weren't. I thought this wasn't an issue.

It will be associated when they finished
Let's see how they deal with Leicester if promoted
Oh hang on not a threat anymore

 

[Bluewonder]

View attachment 98282

This is reaching the realms of absurdity, and I suspect it's due to the imminent appointment of an independent regulator.

Why the hell they think they can demand commercially sensitive information like this, I've no idea.

These red shirted clubs are as deluded as their moron fans.

 

[CC1]

Multiple what if not put out to tender surely the yanks can't tell team who can and can't sponsor them
Oh hang on

Presumably the yanks will also have to prove that, for example, Team Viewer had competition of similar value :)

 

[Rammy Blue]

It’s far too late to stop us anyway, fuck them all.