This is reaching the realms of absurdity, and I suspect it's due to the imminent appointment of an independent regulator.
Why the hell they think they can demand commercially sensitive information like this, I've no idea.
These red shirted clubs are as deluded as their moron fans.
The word ‘NOW’ doing a lot of heavy lifting thereIt’s far too late to stop us anyway, fuck them all.
Of course its bollocks, but that's never stopped the clowns before.The more I think about it, the more I think this is made up bollocks. If you had to have multiple deals of the same value, sponsorship negotiations would amount to a public auction. The thing is, it could never be resolved because, by definition, the best offer could not be matched by multiple other offers.
Of course its bollocks, but that's never stopped the clowns before.
Look at how their clubs are run if you want to see how incompetent they are.
They’ll probably try to retroactively punish us for this tooThis is reaching the realms of absurdity, and I suspect it's due to the imminent appointment of an independent regulator.
Why the hell they think they can demand commercially sensitive information like this, I've no idea.
These red shirted clubs are as deluded as their moron fans.
Just say you only had one offer!This is reaching the realms of absurdity, and I suspect it's due to the imminent appointment of an independent regulator.
Why the hell they think they can demand commercially sensitive information like this, I've no idea.
These red shirted clubs are as deluded as their moron fans.
Absolute nonsense, no way would that be allowed in any business.
It would surely have to be offers of around the same value and not matched exactly as such.The more I think about it, the more I think this is made up bollocks. If you had to have multiple deals of the same value, sponsorship negotiations would amount to a public auction. The thing is, it could never be resolved because, by definition, the best offer could not be matched by multiple other offers.