PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Obviously no-one on here knows what the timeframe might be but that to me makes no sense whatsoever and it certainly wouldn't be in our interests for it to drag on for so long.

The headline figure of 115 charges seemingly consists of a relative handful of actual potential offences (Mancini's contract and a few others) and is padded out by them being repeated for different years plus multiple non co-operation charges. I can't see how that it would take years for an independent panel firstly to decide if the PL has any meaningful evidence or not for each basic charge. Any that they decide that they don't are dismissed and any they think they do then the club would put forward their counter arguments and they reach a conclusion on them. My hope is that it is concluded before the start of next season.

I think we all hope it’s sorted out as soon as possible.

It doesn’t mean it will be though. It could well be years, without any update until it’s finalised.

The only good thing is that it sounds like Pep wants to be here when we’re exonerated.

If that is true, I’m happy for the decision to be in 2060.

 

[Oldtraffordblue1]

Yes he’s right….. tragedy certainly follows them as Colin Mafham eloquently wrote.

Like bees to honey if I remember correctly

 

[BrianW]

I suppose you could look at it another way. An Evil Fairy cast a spell on sweet, pure Liverpool FC. As a result, tragedy and hooliganism go with them wherever they go, like fleas on a dog. But it's not their fault. All the bad stuff is done by evil gnomes, who happen to be invisible but have been wrongly identified as Chelsea fans in the past.

I think we should all allow that this is a genuine possibility.

 

[nmc]

Exactly. The pitiful montage of headlines by that stupid Sweeney fella exemplifies it. The majority of those stupid headlines have subsequently be proven wrong. Wrong, wrong and wrong again. And stupid. How many times must he get things wrong before he realises how stupid he looks. The stupid ****.

In his own prepubescent world he thinks he’s right.

 

[kaz7]

If Carlsberg did smug...

Swoon

 

[kaz7]

Arse !!!View attachment 988430

I would

 

[Mid Wales blue]

Wow we really boil his piss don't we?
Do you know when the ones I circled were published? I can't remember a point in the last 7 years when there was even a hint of possible truth to them!

View attachment 98891

Stop it, I’ve got pee running down my leg!

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

 

[Manchester1894]

Paddy Power are getting boring now. Pretending that the case has disappeared or that PL have swept it under the carpet. It's been handed over to an independent organisation hasn't it? So simply a matter of defending ourselves. Saw a tweet a few months back suggesting we've started tearing them new one already however this eatly into a case means nothing. Charges for non-cooperation seen inevitable however I'd love to see us take those that pressed for this to go forward to account

 

[johnevans]

I suppose you could look at it another way. An Evil Fairy cast a spell on sweet, pure Liverpool FC. As a result, tragedy and hooliganism go with them wherever they go, like fleas on a dog. But it's not their fault. All the bad stuff is done by evil gnomes, who happen to be invisible but have been wrongly identified as Chelsea fans in the past.

I think we should all allow that this is a genuine possibility.

I read an article recently by a Harvard psychologist, Courtney Warren, which explained 'Gaslighters' and 9 typical behaviours via which they express themselves, especially to their intended/actual victims.

Explaining how 'Gaslighters' communicate with their intended/actual victims using phrases such as "You made me do it" as a defence mechanism in their favour, Dr Warren states:

"When something doesn't go as they had planned, gaslighters will often try to avoid taking responsibility by shifting any criticism and blame onto you."

Now, that reminds me..