Because firstly they would have to have that loan agreed and need it to be secured against assets they probably don't have. Secondly, the repayment of the loan and the interest would be accountable in future FFP evaluations.I’d laugh at Everton but I’m worried the PL will go after us even more determined to make up a punishment. We had better make sure we have a completely water-tight defence.
I still don’t understand though how Everton, or us, or Chelsea can be under such scrutiny when there’s a club with over £400m of actual debt yet it’s immune to criticism and continues to spend hundreds of millions a year on new players. Can anyone explain to me why that’s considered ok?
If debt is ok, why couldn’t Everton just borrow say £250m to pay off the deficits that they’re being punished for? Then they could argue they’re only in debt not making a loss, which evidence from a certain club in red suggests is ok.
I genuinely don’t understand.
United are able to do it because despite the loans and the related interest because of their profit they are still able to pass FFP. If Everton put off posting losses due to a loan they would just post them in future accounts instead.