PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Bald fraud]

What I meant to say was that if City had been sanctioned and not Everton they wouldn't have been bothered about FFP then.

Spot on mate

 

[halfcenturyup]

The problem is they had to vote for FFP or they wouldn't have been allowed to compete.

Naah, they could have voted against it, but once it was voted in, they had to comply with it.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Family tree...mainly trunk.

I’m missed their inability to say bootiful properly too.

 

[Bald fraud]

I trust our club even if we were relegated which is highly unlikely we would win promotion the next season and conquer the premier league again.

Same here. But would you put it past them to bring in new rules to stop coming back? I certainly wouldn’t!

 

[KS55]

I believe ‘The other big 6 teams have funded the PL’s case against City’
The rest is horse shit.

Highly unlikely.

 

[BAB.DAB]

It’s only fair as well to acknowledge the charges for failing to cooperate, which being more black and white than subjective the club is likely to end up found in breach and incurring at least some sort of punishment which technically could itself be points deducted but of course would most likely be a chunky fine, which City’s executives would have your arm off now for as an end result.

 

[give it to gordon]

I believe Rishi Sunak recently announced that the independent regulator is due very soon. Would this bring about a re-examination of the facts of our case?

Are the pl just trying to screw any club that threatens the cartel before the independent regulator is appointed ?

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

And don't forget Reading, who abstained and cost the vote!!

Penny for their thoughts now, eh?

Their stupidity and ignorance has proved to be very costly.

 

[cheekybids]

So with Everton they detailed the exact amount failed by to justify punishment. With the United ffp failure they mentioned no figures and something about a small loss! Talk about fudging it!

Minor, very minor, minor loss, just to reiterate it was very minor.

 

[MCFC1993]

It’s only fair as well to acknowledge the charges for failing to cooperate, which being more black and white than subjective the club is likely to end up found in breach and incurring at least some sort of punishment which technically could itself be points deducted but of course would most likely be a chunky fine, which City’s executives would have your arm off now for as an end result.

Failing to cooperate is also something that has to be proved though. Both parties may have different expectations on cooperation.

The Premier League may have asked information that City felt was private and none of their business. Again the burden of proof is with the Premier League on that one too.

30 of the charges are in relation to cooperation. I imagine a breach of cooperation is merely a fine anyway.