PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[lancs blue]

the difference between how Everton who with out a doubt cheated

So you think FFP/PSR is a legitimate policy?

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

I'm not sure that we're willing to take the non-cooperation charge even, but time will tell.

Re. the Fordham "allegations", without going back and purely from memory didn't we agree to not go ahead with that as UEFA(?) told us we couldn't do that? That's why it was wound up, so all monies were accounted for?

The Premier League going after image rights and Mancini’s contract on top of related party sponsorship is interesting as it’s not what Uefa went after City for initially. The length in duration of the charges over nearly a decade feels like this is a desperate attempt at a dragnet by the Premier League to try and extract as much information as possible in view to finding something really juicy to fuck is over with. Perhaps they should have gone after one part of the charges over a smaller period of time, they will come to regret this scattergun way of trying to charge one of their stakeholders.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

So you think FFP/PSR is a legitimate policy?

They must think so. Otherwise they wouldn't have voted it in.

 

[Claytop]

Isn't our 'irrefutable evidence' our audited accounts?

We think they prove that everything was above board but the PL (as Uefa did) don't?

I think the thing that worries most is the 'Independent Commission', we trusted CAS to be truly independent whereas this isn't the case with the IC.

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

the difference between how Everton who with out a doubt cheated and us are talked about is staggering. When Everton scored the second goal against Newcastle it was such a tail (fairytale) how the are saving them selfe from the harsh penalty but every City titles are tainted, even it is not proven we are guilty.

I even heard the commentators say something about the crowd being noisy, pretty sure it was "it shows have injustice can bring people together"

 

[Kippax77]

I even heard the commentators say something about the crowd being noisy, pretty sure it was "it shows have injustice can bring people together"

You heard correctly.
A club that admitted breaking the rules gets punished and the media's narrative is 'injustice'.
Compare that to a club who admits to doing nothing wrong and the narrative swiftly changes to 'guilty' and 'throw the book at the cheating bastards'.
Strange one that

 

[Pablo ZZZ Peroni]

I'm not sure that we're willing to take the non-cooperation charge even, but time will tell.

Re. the Fordham "allegations", without going back and purely from memory didn't we agree to not go ahead with that as UEFA(?) told us we couldn't do that? That's why it was wound up, so all monies were accounted for?

This might help:

PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

We would have to be aware of that when signing. You can't just amend a contract after it's been signed In the PL rules, clubs and the League shall " behave towards each other with utmost good faith" Do you think certain clubs and the PL, have acted towards City "with utmost good faith" What...

forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk

 

[Asa's left peg]

First ever to win treble then get relegated the following season we love them sort of records

Not past 40 points yet!

 

[eastmanc]

Isn't our 'irrefutable evidence' our audited accounts?

We think they prove that everything was above board but the PL (as Uefa did) don't?

I think the thing that worries most is the 'Independent Commission', we trusted CAS to be truly independent whereas this isn't the case with the IC.

The Premier League for years signed those audited accounts off as being legitimate now they don't think they are, why is that?

 

[slbsn]

The Premier League for years signed those audited accounts off as being legitimate now they don't think they are, why is that?

The PL don’t sign off accounts. They rely on them to be true and fair. If they aren’t it’s the clubs fault