PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[silva_is_gold]

Are all these American Dellis failing FFP or has the thread changed.

Yeah
Foods
Fooking
Pants
Lol

 

[Damanino]

PL will be investigating next season what is extra revenue from Fifa that no other PL clubs are getting in 23-24.

 

[birchwoodgingerste]

How they going to kick us out now gonna be incredibly difficult.

 

[halfcenturyup]

How they going to kick us out now gonna be incredibly difficult.

It's going to be incredibly difficult because they won't be able to prove their allegations.

 

[Chris in London]

Pretty sure this is incorrect. If fraud/concealment is proved then the statute of limitations doesn't apply.

That’s not quite correct.

if fraud or concealment is proved, the limitation period still applies (6 years) but the period starts to run from the point at which the fraud was discovered, which the PL would say was the publication of the Der Spiegel articles

In other words, if there is fraud, we are within the limitation period, but if there is no fraud there is no case to answer in any event

 

[halfcenturyup]

That’s not quite correct.

if fraud or concealment is proved, the limitation period still applies (6 years) but the period starts to run from the point at which the fraud was discovered, which the PL would say was the publication of the Der Spiegel articles

In other words, if there is fraud, we are within the limitation period, but if there is no fraud there is no case to answer in any event.

I love it when I get something right. :)

 

[Jimmieblue]

IMO it would now cause an ‘international incident’ if City were found guilty and given a significant punishment.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

I imagine the PL are praying for a very "bad news day" indeed.

 

[Saddleworth2]

I imagine the PL are praying for a very "bad news day" indeed.

They already have one. We won and are the best team in the land and all the world. Official.

 

[jaiguruKun]

That’s not quite correct.

if fraud or concealment is proved, the limitation period still applies (6 years) but the period starts to run from the point at which the fraud was discovered, which the PL would say was the publication of the Der Spiegel articles

In other words, if there is fraud, we are within the limitation period, but if there is no fraud there is no case to answer in any event

And the question has to be then, if there has been fraud, why hasn't there been an ounce of interest shown by any of the prosecuting authorities such as the SFO or HMRC (if there had been I very much doubt we wouldn't know about it).