PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

pudge said:
bs2.gif
Click to expand...
What you mean this trial isnt going to be like my cousin vinny?

Whats the fucking point then?
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
Some examples of Sui Genesis:
4 in a row.
100 points.
32 wins in a PL season.
23 consecutive home wins.
20 consecutive away wins.
12 consecutive away PL wins.
10 consecutive wins in UEFA competitions.
11 CL games won in a season.
25 consecutive games unbeaten in CL.
32 unbeaten games at home in CL.
169 goals in a season.
106 goals in a PL season.
36 league wins a calendar year.
19 away league wins in a calendar year.
Not forgetting being relegated the year after winning the top division.

I sometimes forget what a privilege it is supporting this team……
Click to expand...
Also Sui generis: we cheated for ten years but nobody has found any evidence. The world wide conspiracy with Khoolhand pulling the strings is so Sui generis, it is unique.
 
terraloon said:
personally can’t see how they would have not carried on with the stadium project.If that project had been put on ice surely the whole of football save city would see that as a self sign of guilt
Click to expand...
Maybe they wouldn’t have started it as it was announced after the charges and many years after the investigation
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
Some examples of Sui Genesis:
4 in a row.
100 points.
32 wins in a PL season.
23 consecutive home wins.
20 consecutive away wins.
12 consecutive away PL wins.
10 consecutive wins in UEFA competitions.
11 CL games won in a season.
25 consecutive games unbeaten in CL.
32 unbeaten games at home in CL.
169 goals in a season.
106 goals in a PL season.
36 league wins a calendar year.
19 away league wins in a calendar year.
Not forgetting being relegated the year after winning the top division.

I sometimes forget what a privilege it is supporting this team……
Click to expand...
This place has gone to the dogs, not one single post asking what Phil Collins has to do with it.
 
Centurions said:
This place has gone to the dogs, not one single post asking what Phil Collins has to do with it.
Click to expand...
I know there's no p in vimto but it's pronounced with one ...... Can Phil Collins play left back/CDM?

Hope this helps you continue reading without stupid post withdrawal symptoms :)
 
kaz7 said:
Thank you for telling us gundy has only signed for a year , who knew and why mention the championship at all ?

Gundy has in fact got the option for another year
Click to expand...
That comment was in response to another poster.
 
Prophet of Doom said:
Jordan is the mouthpiece of certain PL CEO’s and owners. It was obvious this week that he has had a push to press on certain issues regarding the 115 case.

The blokes integrity has been blown out of the water already this week. His regular snide comments on Frank Warren and Eddie Hearn - and magically it conspires that he’s in bed financially as an investor with Ben Shalom.

I wonder when his football link up will be exposed ?
Click to expand...
I googled “Jordon’s mouth piece “and all the results are same picture with a man eating dildo.
 
BerkshireBlue said:
7.1 just states the terms have been set out and written down in proper contract. It has fuck all to do with money or how he's paid. If city had a contract with Mancini then that is it.

What's happened, and this is by clear evidence, is the Premier League, like yourself, have tried to apply 2023 rules back to 2009 to 2013. We know that happened due to the ridiculous public release statement that was rushed out. They then had to backtrack and rerelease it months later correcting the content but they still kept the original charge in, as they had to otherwise they'd look stupid but they did changed the numbers for each rule book.

They quoted

for each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2012/13 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with its manager, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2009/10 to 2011/12 inclusive, Premier League Rules Q.7 and Q.8; and
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules P.7 and P.8; and

which is the 2023 definition of the rules but mention Q7 and Q8 of the handbook which also states a contract is written. So for me and probably everyone else this just doesn't stand up at all legally. The Premier have 100% fucked up on this bit of the charge sheet.

I'll also add nothing illegal has happened here, a manager can have two contracts with two different organisations for tax burden reduction purposes. Which is why all of this Mancini stuff will end up being not guilty due to the statute of limitation anyway
Click to expand...

For the sake of peace and harmony, I will say that I agree with the very last sentence. Well, apart from the fact there is no statute of limitations in English law. Oh, and it won't be not guilty, it will be not proven.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top