PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Elbow beards]

Please find this fantastic artist and give a massive statue asap

Ai mate, it ain't real

 

[ufo]

Ai mate, it ain't real

Even AI hates rags

 

[ufo]

Some examples of Sui Genesis:
4 in a row.
100 points.
32 wins in a PL season.
23 consecutive home wins.
20 consecutive away wins.
12 consecutive away PL wins.
10 consecutive wins in UEFA competitions.
11 CL games won in a season.
25 consecutive games unbeaten in CL.
32 unbeaten games at home in CL.
169 goals in a season.
106 goals in a PL season.
36 league wins a calendar year.
19 away league wins in a calendar year.
Not forgetting being relegated the year after winning the top division.

I sometimes forget what a privilege it is supporting this team……

Agreed ! I can feel it in the air tonight and against all odds , it feels like another day in paradise

 

[Chris in London]

Moreover any judgment will be reserved. They won’t be making any decisions during the hearing.

They certainly will.

They just won't tell anyone yet

;)

 

[Bez]

I think he meant high ups. Doesn’t otherwise make sense.

You are right. I refer to "grown ups" in a derogatory way regarding senior people at Sky. It's a pisstake.

 

[cheekybids]

Please find this fantastic artist and give a massive statue asap

Hs name is Banksy!

 

[terraloon]

Moreover any judgment will be reserved. They won’t be making any decisions during the hearing.

On that point would that mean that till such time as all the evidence has been put forward there wouldn’t even be a ruling re if matters were time barred?

My reading of the CAS hearing was that they very much determined matters re time prior to fully exploring the charges that were too old.

 

[Champions again in 2012]

On that point would that mean that till such time as all the evidence has been put forward there wouldn’t even be a ruling re if matters were time barred?

My reading of the CAS hearing was that they very much determined matters re time prior to fully exploring the charges that were too old.

I'm no solicitor but i would think the first thing to do would be to decide which of the allegations, if any, are time barred to save time unnecesarily deliberating them.

 

[BerkshireBlue]

For the sake of peace and harmony, I will say that I agree with the very last sentence. Well, apart from the fact there is no statute of limitations in English law. Oh, and it won't be not guilty, it will be not proven.

apart from the fact it does https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58 you're right again lol

 

[BerkshireBlue]

I'm no solicitor but i would think the first thing to do would be to decide which of the allegations, if any, are time barred to save time unnecesarily deliberating them.

To do that they still have to hear the whole case around the charges and work out if any fraud or concealment has taken place (cooking the books) or whether the premier league already knew about the details (like Fordham). If they can't prove that then statue of limitations apply. I seriously doubt they can prove any fraud happened because most likely it didn't. Why would the Execs at city and multiple other well respected businesses commit fraud when there was no need to.

 

[jaiguruKun]

I'm no solicitor but i would think the first thing to do would be to decide which of the allegations, if any, are time barred to save time unnecesarily deliberating them.

I think all the evidence has to heard in order to determine whether there's been fraud and concealment i.e. if there is an exception to the general 6-year limitation period.

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

apart from the fact it does https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58 you're right again lol

What are you two gonna do when this thread finally closes?

 

[Keeper!]

Found @tolmie's hairdoo 's source!

I did not know Omar did street art!

 

[r.soleofsalford]

Agreed ! I can feel it in the air tonight and against all odds , it feels like another day in paradise

As long as it’s no oblivion. We make a good team.

 

[slbsn]

On that point would that mean that till such time as all the evidence has been put forward there wouldn’t even be a ruling re if matters were time barred?

My reading of the CAS hearing was that they very much determined matters re time prior to fully exploring the charges that were too old.

Not at all. They heard the evidence on Etisalat. They won’t be confirming any decision during the hearing

 

[slbsn]

I'm no solicitor but i would think the first thing to do would be to decide which of the allegations, if any, are time barred to save time unnecesarily deliberating them.

It won’t work that way. The SOL decisions require all evidence to be heard

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Hs name is Banksy!

Mr Banks to you.

 

[slbsn]

I don’t agree. They’ll make their minds up as the evidence plays out.

You need to separate the impressions and conclusions of the panel in their heads and between themselves from the decision and formal written conclusions. The decision will 100% be reserved (ie not handed down at the end of the hearing) and the panel will not want to give the impression they have made any decision until all of the evidence has been heard.

But of course, an impression and direction of travel will build through the hearing.

 

[BerkshireBlue]

What are you two gonna do when this thread finally closes?

have a beer celebrating City's win while watching the premier league burn down to the ground

 

[Champions again in 2012]

It won’t work that way. The SOL decisions require all evidence to be heard

Thanks for the clarification. No wonder the legal bills are racking up