I reckon city will get a warning of sorts that some of the legal and accounting “ practices” will need to be replaced in the future assessment period. Probably throw in the club not acting in good faith and then pages of innuendos but nothing to counter claim our “irrefutable” evidence.
It’s the only way out, dress it up how they like but it’s a home run for the club unless evidence is produced. The legals on here always go on about the high probability and if it is indeed applied in the strictest sense then the level of proof is far too high for the league to reach on such flimsy emails.
So just like every other blabber mouth, they can accuse and use bias logic to find guilt but nothing concrete. The paper trail is not open to them.