PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

creditunionhero said:
If Mancini had a second job/consultancy, he is perfectly entitled to privacy in his affairs. If the PL think he was paid for a second role, then they should show the club the evidence. They would also have to prove the club knew he was being paid by a related party. A related party has no obligation to share who they employ with the PL, City or anyone else.
Lots of people have 2nd 3rd 4th or even 5th jobs and are free to do so. Lots of people at the top of the PL can have more than one job.
Click to expand...
Yep MPs for example, obviously they have to declare the 50 or so jobs they hold. A private citizen can say fuck off, none of your business.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m sure I’ve read previously that Mancini’s Al-Jazera consultancy contract was in place prior to him even being City’s manager?
 
Bell7575 said:
If they were would they not come first - standard procedure Is criminal stuff takes priority.
Click to expand...
This VV

If a former player had turned informer to HMRC they would have raided the Club months ago without warning, for Tax avoiding business practices.

HMRC would have Seized all digital Media including Hard Drives.

That has not happened to my knowledge.

I am calling it what it is 100% Bullshit. Click bait on Twitter.
 
This'll just rumble on until the govt threat to impose an independent regulator on the pl goes away then it will fizzle out. Off the hook on technicalities no doubt so the stink of shit remains. Maybe a few stick and we pay a fine.
All about showing the pl can regulate itself and keeping the cartel pacified enough to avoid a breakaway esl.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.