PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Despite losing at CAS UEFA still believe City were/are guilty. Ceferin has made some recent comments via The Telegraph. City's exec should call him up to ask him to explain himself and ask him what specific evidence is Ceferin referring to? Ceferin's reps presided over a kangaroo court. What a jerk!


Can't believe he agreed to an interview about it!
 
It’s a non-story.

Cererin says that he trusted the process of his commission and that they acted properly.

CAS thought differently.

End.
He's not said their process was correct, he's said their decision was correct.

Basically, even though CAS found they had no evidence, we're guilty anyway.

"We know we were right."

Erm, no you fucking weren't mate.
 
The problem has been the capture of the governing bodies by a group of clubs with a jealous, protectionist outlook which sees competition as an evil to be avoided at all costs rather than as a pathway to progress for the game.

Boom! There it is.

Look around the globe and find me a league anywhere near as competitive as the Premier League.

While you’re at it, look at the outsized relative revenues of the small handful of clubs in those leagues.

Therein lies the problem for the Red Tops! How do they skim the monies they desire WHILE still keeping the PL as the global spectacle it has become?

Answer: Create a situation where smaller clubs can be big enough to keep the illusion of competitiveness, WHILE ensuring none of those clubs actually has the financial wherewithal to usurp or unseat the power clubs. With the level of Red Top revenues, and the omission of “infrastructure” costs to enable them to expand their stadiums, and thus revenues, without any offsetting costs!


And I would point out that it is FFP and P&S which compels clubs to operate at a profitand punishes clubs for "overspending" on players. Clubs are in need of regulation but, I'm afraid experience leads to the conclusion that the law is rather better at it than football's governing bodies.

Their nightmare scenario.
 
He's not said their process was correct, he's said their decision was correct.

Basically, even though CAS found they had no evidence, we're guilty anyway.
He trusts their decision was correct. There’s a difference.

However, that nuance will be ignored and we’ll have 200 extra pages by lunchtime tomorrow.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.