I don’t follow
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Here are the quotes.
He does accept CAS decision, but as the figurehead of UEFA, he has to back his commission in coming to the right conclusion, even though he wasn‘t part of it.
They should have asked him why UEFA sacked the chief investigator Leterme after the CAS verdict and what he thought of Leterme forgetting to charge PSG within the time limits?
Rory Bluelow
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,149
The language used doesn’t really make senseIt’s a non-story.
Ceferin says that he trusted the process of his commission and that they acted properly.
CAS thought differently.
End.
”we know we were right”
”we wouldn’t decide unless we think we were right”
Based on the six emails they had I can believe they thought they were right but the evidence proved them wrong. His first sentence may just be a clumsy defence of his organisation based on what they knew at the time…I’d be much more concerned if he came out and said CAS got it wrong - he’s not saying that.
Telegraph stirring the shit again.
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Ceferin is trying to force through changes to the UEFA constitution to place he and his associates in power for a generation
So he’s trying to court and placate the old G14 dinosaurs, while at the same time pretending to be the new best mate of us and PSG
He’s playing both ends against the middle
It’s all typically dishonest politics and double dealing
So he’s trying to court and placate the old G14 dinosaurs, while at the same time pretending to be the new best mate of us and PSG
He’s playing both ends against the middle
It’s all typically dishonest politics and double dealing
Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 29,259
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
Let's face it, are we really expecting him to fulfill his obligations as a decent, upstanding member of the mythical, 'football family' ?But he is a supposed lawyer who doesn't respect the courts decision and is CEO of a governing organisation. Not the man in the street who claims he was fitted up.
We know what they are and we know what they want.
Nothing has changed since they shifted the FFP goalposts.
Wasn't it the Telegraph who reported that?still nothing on the expected development on our PL charges/case.
something will be made public (maybe date of hearing?).
wonder if they release it on Thursday so it can dominate the news just before our game vs Spurs?
If so, it's probably the interview they have with Ceferin.
That's all that is needed to establish our guilt in the court of public opinion.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Plus they should’ve asked him why he offered us a lesser punishment a few months before UEFA announced they’d banned us for 2 yearsThey should have asked him why UEFA sacked the chief investigator Leterme after the CAS verdict and what he thought of Leterme forgetting to charge PSG within the time limits?
Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
Mischief-making by the Telegraph. I expect getting that headline was the sole purpose of requesting an interview with him. They even tell you the loaded question they asked to elicit the required response.
And he uses the word "concrete" out of context twice. I don't think he knows what it means.
And he uses the word "concrete" out of context twice. I don't think he knows what it means.
They should have asked him why UEFA sacked the chief investigator Leterme after the CAS verdict and what he thought of Leterme forgetting to charge PSG within the time limits?
Because Ben Rumsby wasn't bothered about any of that he got what he wanted and the Telegraph wanted with that headline! Total witch hunt by 99% of the media!