“Could” doesn’t sound as good as “won’t” when selling papers.
Interesting he mentions its actually only 3 Charges. Guess that doesnt sound as good as 115 or damage or reputation as much
130 rules broken.It blows me away that the comprehension level with other fans is so low as to think we've broken 115 separate rules. I dont even know if there are 115 rules for FFP/PSR
130 rules broken.
Keep up mate -:)
That’s one million points deduction and the club destroyed. Ironically ffp was supposed to stop clubs going to the wall lol.
Used Portsmouth as an excuse to rig the game in favour of the legacy clubs.
That’s corruption.
‘If’
Just listened to Stefan on Talkshite. Bit about the 115 at the end. Jordan is dying for us to get found guilty. He says we have a case to answer but doesn’t expand on that. Calls us state owned again but doesn’t get picked up on that.
Re that maguire info from sky sports.
He said” another club is close to breaching premier rules, doesn't play in red”.
FFP in a nutshell. No need for any further discussion or debate.
Clubs have been making off the books payments for years and that’s only what we know about.
It’s a filthy game off the pitch.
Forest play in red.be chelsea or forest
While listening to it, i was thinking. They were talking as if we're either going to be found guilty or not guilty.Just listened to Stefan on Talkshite. Bit about the 115 at the end. Jordan is dying for us to get found guilty. He says we have a case to answer but doesn’t expand on that. Calls us state owned again but doesn’t get picked up on that.
Not Chelsea, according to Swiss Ramble.be chelsea or forest
The likelihood is that it will be on the none co-operation charges as these are the hardest to argue as they are subjective rather than finite and i believe thats why they were added, the legal team of the pl knew they didnt have a prayer of making the main stuff stick so they added a load of other fluff on so the whole thing didnt look as ridiculous as it plainly is.While listening to it, i was thinking. They were talking as if we're either going to be found guilty or not guilty.
Is it not more likely that we are found guilty of some of the charges but not all of them?
Therefore the punishment will be dependant on what these are.
got to be the geordiesNot Chelsea, according to Swiss Ramble.
Guilty of being called Man City.While listening to it, i was thinking. They were talking as if we're either going to be found guilty or not guilty.
Is it not more likely that we are found guilty of some of the charges but not all of them?
Therefore the punishment will be dependant on what these are.
I actually think they knew from the start that proving the 3/6 substantial charges was nearly impossible based on the evidence and the high bar set. So threw their toys out and splashed 115 everywhere with the help of the 6 teams that hate us.The likelihood is that it will be on the none co-operation charges as these are the hardest to argue as they are subjective rather than finite and i believe thats why they were added, the legal team of the pl knew they didnt have a prayer of making the main stuff stick so they added a load of other fluff on so the whole thing didnt look as ridiculous as it plainly is.
Leicester.Not Chelsea, according to Swiss Ramble.