A name does tend to jump off the page doesn’t it…?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
chesterguy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,506
Exactly and the only 2 people still in UEFA that investigated and punished City are Petra Stanonik Bošnjak (Slovenia) and Jacobo Beltrán (Spain) alll the rest have left. Petros Mavroidis (Greece) resigned because of the way the Committee, of which he was a member, dealt with the PSG affair which was corruption in plain sightHow’s the investigation of the leaks
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
I have a red pal, very good job, intelligent bloke.
He came out with the same old shit, “you must be guilty because u got fined”. I explained that the fine was for non cooperation with uefa as they were leaking info and that we preferred to go straight to CAS so knew we would incur the fine”.
He went quiet … looked at me for 10 seconds and jusr replied , “bollocks”.
Ive had other people, again seemingly sensible people, say we must have bribed CAS. I mean … fuck me … they think we turned up at CAS with a suitcase of money.
So thats what we are up against. I think the whole thing has been a total smear campaign and the red shirts werent arsed if we are found guilty or not, its job already done
So when he said it was bollocks did you leave it there or give him the tirade
Mancity1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 10,204
The last stage of grief, that’s a great way of looking at it.Maybe it’s just me but this is clear as fuck we are on last stage of grief. These desperate cunts have all run out of ideas. I fucking hate when the very **** who raised a question keeps moving the post . The question was about whether man city will be idolized or not like the cartels ? Since when did city players cheat financially to gain advantage on the pitch ? fucking thick pigs.
Good work. Thanks for posting.I've lost the details of those that said they'd be interested in this. About 6 lads direct messaged me in the summer and those messages have expired.
It's taken a while, but I have put together as much accurate information as I can about this subject on the following website. Obviously, it's heavily influenced by my opinion, but I have referenced everything I can.
Man City Stuff - All things about the best team in the land and all the world
All things about the best team in the land and all the worldmancitystuff.co.uk
One peice of feedback I've had, is that it is a mad man's rant. I am mad and annoyed about it! As far as I'm concerned the more stuff there is out there supporting the City side of the argument the better! I'll keep posting everytime I learn or pick up on something new.
There are plenty of mistakes, so if you spot any typos or obvious errors please let me know. I've always made typos and have never been able to spell. It's very much a work in progress, but I hope it provides some useful pointers/references for anyone interested:
NB
1)
I'd like to credit the Blue who counted the charges and highlighted that there were 134, not 115. I can't find his post though, it's somewhere in the thread. If it was you please let me know.
2)
FYI - 3 of the charges relate to breaking rule E60. This rule is about adjusting your allowable losses by £22m for playing in the err Championship.....
Digging Deeper into the Charges Against City - Man City Stuff
City's allowable losses reduced because they are a Football League Club! In this post, I will look at the actual charges against City. What I didn't realise before I started going through this was how contrived and how full of bulls**t these charges actualy are. This will soon become...mancitystuff.co.uk
Regards 1, someone made an attempt to break down the charges here: https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/index.php?posts/16649344
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
No point whatsoever. I just laughed at him.So when he said it was bollocks did you leave it there or give him the tirade
Truth hurts
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
You must of laughed and call him a fucking prick. It’s the law.No point whatsoever. I just laughed at him.
Truth hurts
manimanc
Well-Known Member
I've saved the link. Thanks for this blue, I just had a quick peek and was engrossed already.I've lost the details of those that said they'd be interested in this. About 6 lads direct messaged me in the summer and those messages have expired.
It's taken a while, but I have put together as much accurate information as I can about this subject on the following website. Obviously, it's heavily influenced by my opinion, but I have referenced everything I can.
Man City Stuff - All things about the best team in the land and all the world
All things about the best team in the land and all the worldmancitystuff.co.uk
One peice of feedback I've had, is that it is a mad man's rant. I am mad and annoyed about it! As far as I'm concerned the more stuff there is out there supporting the City side of the argument the better! I'll keep posting everytime I learn or pick up on something new.
There are plenty of mistakes, so if you spot any typos or obvious errors please let me know. I've always made typos and have never been able to spell. It's very much a work in progress, but I hope it provides some useful pointers/references for anyone interested:
NB
1)
I'd like to credit the Blue who counted the charges and highlighted that there were 134, not 115. I can't find his post though, it's somewhere in the thread. If it was you please let me know.
2)
FYI - 3 of the charges relate to breaking rule E60. This rule is about adjusting your allowable losses by £22m for playing in the err Championship.....
Digging Deeper into the Charges Against City - Man City Stuff
City's allowable losses reduced because they are a Football League Club! In this post, I will look at the actual charges against City. What I didn't realise before I started going through this was how contrived and how full of bulls**t these charges actualy are. This will soon become...mancitystuff.co.uk
Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
Reminds me of civilized conversation i had with some dipper in a bar .I have a red pal, very good job, intelligent bloke.
He came out with the same old shit, “you must be guilty because u got fined”. I explained that the fine was for non cooperation with uefa as they were leaking info and that we preferred to go straight to CAS so knew we would incur the fine”.
He went quiet … looked at me for 10 seconds and jusr replied , “bollocks”.
Ive had other people, again seemingly sensible people, say we must have bribed CAS. I mean … fuck me … they think we turned up at CAS with a suitcase of money.
So thats what we are up against. I think the whole thing has been a total smear campaign and the red shirts werent arsed if we are found guilty or not, its job already done
Dips- your owners paid under the table
me - show me the receipt
dips - it’s on the email
me-wtf email? like the one Nigerian prince promised me gold coins if i send him my bank account info? we are taking about digits not some fairy dust on a unicorn nose .
Dips- whatever it’s in the email somewhere .
jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,736
I think they're still in the denial/anger phase.The last stage of grief, that’s a great way of looking at it.