PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Phil1]

NHIAC

Always has and always will be. His attacks on our club shouldn’t be forgiven because he kept his mouth shut this time knowing he couldn’t just block Stefan.

 

[MillionMilesAway]

I am certain he does, and I am also certain he knows the way the third member of the CAS panel was perfectly normal.

I'm certain of it too.

 

[mimicmickmickdoyle]

First time I have listened to harris what a knobhead. Wouldnr except that the red tops plus spurs are been it all lol

First class Projectriver.

I'm still worried the pl must have something big because if they havent this is embarrassing for the pl the brand, everything. Pl will self implode.

I still think City are innocent but cant get my head around why the pl brought this case

Having listened to the podcast I'm with you, still worried the pl have something they can get us on, just hope I'm wrong.

 

[I'm Blue]

Having listened to the podcast I'm with you, still worried the pl have something they can get us on, just hope I'm wrong.

From all I’ve heard since this all began, it seems to be very similar charges and evidence to the UEFA charges.
We don’t know what ‘evidence’ has been presented by the premier league, but City and their lawyers surely must have.
‘Irrefutable evidence’ tells you they aren’t worried.
The premier league will definitely nail us on non cooperation though : )

 

[OrigamiNinja]

Certainly listening to that had shown me that Harris doesn't know enough to absolutely hammer our club the way he has.

He came across as an average football fan spouting things that seem unfair. It feels quite personal with him.

Is it personal or is it profitable?

 

[BringBackSwales]

First time I have listened to harris what a knobhead. Wouldnr except that the red tops plus spurs are been it all lol

First class Projectriver.

I'm still worried the pl must have something big because if they havent this is embarrassing for the pl the brand, everything. Pl will self implode.

I still think City are innocent but cant get my head around why the pl brought this case

Probably not. The PL brought the case because masters was under pressure from united liverpool arsenal spurs etc

 

[give it to gordon]

Probably not. The PL brought the case because masters was under pressure from united liverpool arsenal spurs etc

Can it really be that simple ?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

This may be worth a listen - me v Nick Harris on the excellent Unofficial Partner podcast...

Downloaded that for my trip to the NEC tomorrow. Although I'm not sure whether I'll be able to keep going in a straight line when Harris comes out with his usual bollocks.

 

[oakiecokie]

The pl brought this under pressure from the cartel. Either way the cartel are on a winner. City win the case, the pl is destroyed and opens the door for the super league without City. City lose, the cartel have got rid of us.

I`ve read some shit on this thread but by far and away that tops the fucking lot.

 

[hgblue]

£100 million a year from Etihad will get some piss boiling and probably why the Premier League are trying to change the rules on related parties. If you look at it Etihad are getting very good exposure from their association from the club, they are posting record profits so why can’t they throw some extra money City’s way in sponsorships.

I guess ten years ago you could have argued that the sponsorship deal was over valued. However, in hindsight it was an absolutely inspired piece of business by Etihad. Just imagine how much our brand recognition has increased since that deal was signed and how beneficial that association has been to Etihad. How much would they have had to pay in advertising to reach that many people and have such a positive impact? Harris is in possession of these facts but seems not to want to take them into account. Why are these journalists so desperate to see City get screwed over?