PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

You mean this? Not exactly the same is it?


My response to that would be none of the above.

I do however, believe that MCFC are one of the best run football clubs on the planet.

Look at the money we've spent/invested and compare and contrast that with..... oh! I don't know; the rags?

My guess is that it's the gulf that exists between the two clubs that is the driving force behind this whole saga.
 
My response to that would be none of the above.

I do however, believe that MCFC are one of the best run football clubs on the planet.

Look at the money we've spent/invested and compare and contrast that with..... oh! I don't know; the rags?

My guess is that it's the gulf that exists between the two clubs that is the driving force behind this whole saga.
clickbait of Daily Fail proportions
 
There's too many pages to read and far to much speculation to digest. Does anyone know categorically of the outcome will come at the end of march? I have read some articles saying it is and Others saying it could go on and on. So like everything else related to this debacle is the result date being touted also just speculation?
Maybe, maybe not
 
That's not how I read it myself, I thought it was more a comment about how polarised society in general is (just look at the yanks eating themselves).

To be fair I may be giving him far too much latitude there but only he could answer as to his motives.

It would appear you are in Sam Lee's target audience.
 
I consider myself to have been educated. Again. I was thinking "complaint" related to the whole complaint of 115/130 alleged breaches, not any particular breach within the complaint. Bloody lawyers :)

So is it likely an appeals panel will reconsider liability and then pass the findings back to the original panel for sanction? Or will the appeals panel consider sanctions themselves? Seems strange (and a little disrespectful) to pass the whole thing round from one to the other like a hot potato .....
Actually think it is most likely the the original IC will finish its case by deciding sanction (if any) and then allowing the whole thing to go to appeal
 
I don't know if anybody listens to Big Steves podcast "We are the south stand", but he said earlier this evening that he got an email recently from the BBC and ITV about coming on when the charges result drops.

ITV and the BBC told him in the email they have been briefed the results are imminent.

I think we are going to know during the international break.
 
I don't know if anybody listens to Big Steves podcast "We are the south stand", but he said earlier this evening that he got an email recently from the BBC and ITV about coming on when the charges result drops.

ITV and the BBC told him in the email they have been briefed the results are imminent.

I think we are going to know during the international break.

The day of reckoning beckons. Bring it on!
 
I don't know if anybody listens to Big Steves podcast "We are the south stand", but he said earlier this evening that he got an email recently from the BBC and ITV about coming on when the charges result drops.

ITV and the BBC told him in the email they have been briefed the results are imminent.

I think we are going to know during the international break.
Would make sense because I thought the pre-publicity for the recent Clive Myrie series said the same production team intended to produce content on the reaction to “the verdict” too. I can’t recall the exact wording but it made me think they expected a result very soon after releasing the series.
 
I was thinking, should we be found innocent, a decent banner might be pictures of Delaney, Harris, Tebas, and anyone else of note with the words “Blinkered Crackpots” across it.

A banner would be a great idea with Masters and his connections to Red cartel.

The likes of Harris and Delaney would actually take it as a compliment as they are really small time
 
I don't know if anybody listens to Big Steves podcast "We are the south stand", but he said earlier this evening that he got an email recently from the BBC and ITV about coming on when the charges result drops.

ITV and the BBC told him in the email they have been briefed the results are imminent.

I think we are going to know during the international break.
If true, so much for the confidentilaity of the proceedings, though we could have guessed as much from the airing of the Beeb's podcast.
 
I think there are portions of the media that are starting to think. They are thinking that City might just be innocent i suspect. It’s only from one or two, and the likes of Jordan not being as one sided, but it seems to be changing. Hopefully they will start to sniff out a story about how the PL have tried to stop one of their clubs being better than their flagship clubs.. I dream though.
Interesting that Martin Lipton said we are in the clear in his opion
 
Wasn't your point of hidden payments theoretical & the panel will decide on basis of probability. Like I said, I'm not an accountant, but if the books add up after Uefa told us to cease with Fordham then I can't see the EPL having a case.

If there was any evidence of hidden payments do you not think the EPL would have charged us a lot sooner

It's not theoretical because the internal club documents leaked by der Spiegel mention such loss underwriting payments.

Yes, if the books add up then there isn't a problem, but that is true of every financial allegation ever made. My problem is that for Fordham and Touré I, personally, haven't seen enough in the public domain to be able to conclude there is no issue. If others have, I would be happy to hear it.

And no, imho the PL will have referred the allegations to the disciplinary process when they couldn't take their investigation any further and if they hadn't received, in their opinion, satisfactory answers to their questions.

I will say again, I don't think either of these allegations is in the same class of seriousness as the sponsorship allegations and so I am quite relaxed about them. I am also quite happy to give credit to Khaldoon when he says everything is above board. He has earned that. But when people say things like "what could the PL possibly be confident about?" I think it's perfectly reasonable for me to say that I don't know enough about either of these issues to conclude that there is no problem in the same way that I have been able to, in my mind at least, for the more serious issues around sponsorship.

Probably best to wait for the result of the hearing now, I think.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back