PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

MarsLlama said:
Purely a gut feeling but the part in that email about ‘when the verdict drops in the next month or so’ feels more like ‘it’s happening very soon but we don’t want to make it obvious that we’ve already been told the outcome’.
Click to expand...
You really think they know the outcome and haven't leaked it? Lol. How could they know the outcome?
 
Has Mike Keegan been one of the journalists we’ve been briefing lately along with Matt Lawton at the Times?

The Sky update reads to me as though we’ve won the majority of the charges but may have lost some for non co-operation and are keen this is made clear when announced? The last thing City will want is breaking news declaring us guilty if we’ve only been found guilty of not co-operating.

I’m purely speculating here and have no other information. It just makes sense with the way the media twist things. It could also mean we’ve won the lot and some have been time barred which would be another way the PL could twist things to make it look like we’ve got away with it. Time will tell
 
Last edited:
MarsLlama said:
Purely a gut feeling but the part in that email about ‘when the verdict drops in the next month or so’ feels more like ‘it’s happening very soon but we don’t want to make it obvious that we’ve already been told the outcome’.
Click to expand...
And we don’t know exactly when that email was from. It could’ve been 3 weeks ago as far as we know.
 
ManCitizens. said:
Had Mike Keegan been one of the journalists we’ve been briefing lately along with Matt Lawton at the Times?

The Sky update reads to me last night as though we’ve won the majority of the charges but may have lost some for non co-operation and are keen this in made clear when announced? The last thing City will want is breaking news declaring us guilty if we’ve only been found guilty of not co-operating.

I’m purely speculating here and have no other information. It just makes sense to me with the way the media twist things. It could also mean we’ve won the lot and some have been time barred which would be another way the PL could twist things to make it look like we’ve got away with it. Time will tell
Click to expand...
Either result this is the time to go full on for the throat no warnings just issue lawsuits on every fucker that tells lies about us. I would also be going after the cartel stop this shit once and for all.
 
i think on the viewpoint from other clubs such as Liverpool it would be a complete loss for the PL if were not relegated, thats the final objective 'the target' that there aiming for, anything else and there going to be bitterly disapointed so forget any fines for say non cooperation that is only going to rub salt into there wounds and start the piss boiling
 
ManCitizens. said:
Had Mike Keegan been one of the journalists we’ve been briefing lately along with Matt Lawton at the Times?

The Sky update reads to me last night as though we’ve won the majority of the charges but may have lost some for non co-operation and are keen this in made clear when announced? The last thing City will want is breaking news declaring us guilty if we’ve only been found guilty of not co-operating.

I’m purely speculating here and have no other information. It just makes sense to me with the way the media twist things. It could also mean we’ve won the lot and some have been time barred which would be another way the PL could twist things to make it look like we’ve got away with it. Time will tell
Click to expand...
As you say, pure speculation but worth noting that when the CAS verdict dropped SSN were all over the place dissecting it and that wanker Stephen Warnock was spinning it to the world as a guilty verdict. He eventually got told on air that we’d only received a fine for non-cooperation but by then the damage was done. As Mark Twain said, a lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes. And in these days of social media and 24/7/365 news coverage, it travels all the way round the fucking world!
 
ManCitizens. said:
It just makes sense with the way the media twist things. It could also mean we’ve won the lot and some have been time barred which would be another way the PL could twist things to make it look like we’ve got away with it.
Click to expand...
That would mean the brain dead cunts had brought charges that were time barred under their own fucking rules.
 
Put it this way. In which scenario is it in sky's interest to not promote interest and emotive discussion on the topic of 115? As a media outlet who wants more viewers, more subscribers, and with it the ability to command more revenue from advertising, when would they be hesitant to first and foremost appeal to the majority of their viewership, current and potential, and thus curb the appeal of their own product and own potential earnings?

Either sky have decided to take a turn in positioning and view themselves as an aspiring champion of truth and debate, or there is a possibility that continuing on their current course of letting their employees and own associated third parties have free reign to air their fears, anger and hopes, is actually more damaging to sky and this requires a change of tact.
 
marco said:
i think on the viewpoint from other clubs such as Liverpool it would be a complete loss for the PL if were not relegated, thats the final objective 'the target' that there aiming for, anything else and there going to be bitterly disapointed so forget any fines for say non cooperation that is only going to rub salt into there wounds and start the piss boiling
Click to expand...
From what I've heard it's the turgid gooner scum who have been driving this more than the other red bstards from the off . . .
 
This is going to be one of those moments where we get to see how the cogs of society works.

Not everyone will notice though.

Some will convince themselves that those cogs are spinning freely and smoothly.
Some will convince themselves that those cogs are rough, grinding and noisy.

Very few will be able to see the truth behind the fog of their own bias and agenda.

I'll fucking hate it and the whole circus that will follow. You'll get the odd person who can remain impartial (Stefan an example) but mostly and on both sides, it's going to be go-time at the Football club Agenda GP.

This shit brings out the very worst in society and people who have a hard time being observent, present and rational (ie conscious) at the best of times.

I'll have to guard myself when the news comes. I'm reminded of that big argument i had with the missus on my 1st mobile phone, driving back from site, tired, cold and hungry when i was younger. After a point of no return, i wound the window down, doing 50, and fucked the phone out of the window. No more noise.
Can't afford to do that again lol.

I just want this shit over.
 
uwerosler28 said:
Hopefully the email will stop that stupid South African cow using air quotes when saying we are " not guilty" like last time , she should have been banned from the Etihad from that moment on!
Click to expand...
Agreed. Shame we don’t seem to hand out bans. The owners prefer the ‘holistic’ approach.

Spitty Carragher could rock up to the Etihad wearing a full Dippers kit and piss on Aguero’s statue. We’d still give him the Wi-Fi code and a three-course meal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top