BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Didn’t her husband used to work for GMP?She has a face for radio
Didn’t her husband used to work for GMP?She has a face for radio
Amazed those hastily cobbled together 'charges' had any input from a legal professional. If a builder put a wall up to the same standard he'd be regarded as a cowboy.
To sum up, Annabel Tiffin is in no position to lecture any entity about appalling human rights records when her own husband has a, cough cough, appalling human rights record of his own.
To sum up, Annabel Tiffin is in no position to lecture any entity about appalling human rights records when her own husband has a, cough cough, appalling human rights record of his own.
Neatly put.To sum up, Annabel Tiffin is in no position to lecture any entity about appalling human rights records when her own husband has a, cough cough, appalling human rights record of his own.
I think her question is totally fair game. There is a link there. Might not be entirely relevant to the discussion at hand, but it is there to point out.
I think the comments about her own household are also totally fair game. There is a link there. Might not be entirely relevant to the discussion, but it is there to point out. In exactly the same measure.
With both, there is a bit of a shared answer too. I.e. It’s a bit more complex.
The other comments on her face, demeanour etc, are not really pertinent imo, but it is what it is.