PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Oldham Exile said:
Good point, but TBF - I have been reading this thread avidly every day for months

I gave up on the thread last Wednesday after having to read so many pages of utter shit - so was just exasperated when reading another post on that stupid subject
Click to expand...
Don't disagree on that at all, although it did stop the Gordon Brown discussion in it's tracks.
 
halfcenturyup said:
Some guy posted a month or so ago (apologies if it was you, I can't remember who it was) something that went through each of the (groups of) allegations and came to the conclusion that there would be no proof of any of them.

I didn't agree with some of his thought processes and I found it hard to believe we would be fine on everything, but I am increasingly coming to the conclusion that his final assessment was right.

I just don't see how the PL can realistically prove any of (what we assume to be) the allegations with (what we assume to be) the evidence available to them. Including non-cooperation.

Anyone else?
Click to expand...


To…trap City.

I’m with you man, nothing will happen. The rules are crap and made up nonsense.
 
halfcenturyup said:
Some guy posted a month or so ago (apologies if it was you, I can't remember who it was) something that went through each of the (groups of) allegations and came to the conclusion that there would be no proof of any of them.

I didn't agree with some of his thought processes and I found it hard to believe we would be fine on everything, but I am increasingly coming to the conclusion that his final assessment was right.

I just don't see how the PL can realistically prove any of (what we assume to be) the allegations with (what we assume to be) the evidence available to them. Including non-cooperation.

Anyone else?
Click to expand...

The only thing that scares me is the possibility that ‘the charges’ are just part of a wider pre-decided stitch up. I don’t think the PL has any real evidence
 
Coatigan said:
It is a tricky one for the PL. If they investigate Chelsea's historic issues, on top of ours, it really raises questions over how poor their review process is.

Ok, you could maybe argue that we cooked the books and they missed it because it was concealed fraud (assuming you are Jamie Carragher).

But if Chelsea did it too, without their noticing, then pretty much anyone else might hsve been too and their process wouldn't have flagged it.
Click to expand...
Ive always said if we are guilty of anything then I'm pretty sure almost every club has done the same and part of the delay is the PL to allow these clubs to cover their tracks
 
Chelsea investigation should not take years given its the new owners found and admitted to some of the wrongdoing. there could be more under the carpet they did not bring forward and that may need some further investigation, let alone the current parallel PSR breaches...

I bet originally they brought in PSR rules to single out City and punish us, but now they face the situation of going after other clubs too and penny is starting to drop.
even in mainstream media some noises like "so these rules are not stopping City but resulting points deduction for other clubs, then whats the point this isnt what we hoped this is"
the mask is slipping...

and the rotten face of Masters starts to show with a look of an urgent diarrhea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.