PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

give it to gordon said:
I cant understand this either. The pl were only 'tipped off' by stolen emails.

So other clubs could be cooking the books and the pl wouldnt have a clue or investigate unless they get hacked.

It's a very strange way to run a multi billion business, to rely on stolen information and hacked about emails.

But why were City chosen to be hacked ? Who was behind this ? Surely the dippers would have been better as on their books its shows 50million for some work into Anfield which never happened. Would also find proof of dipperpool hacking into our scouting base.

Why dont the pl look into the odd pattern of performance at dipperpool. Two seasons on it the 3rd mid table, than back on it first 2 seasons, than mid table. That second half against us they were like juiced up bunnies, something clear odd about that. I have watch pro cycling for decades you can see when someone has juiced. That second half was iffy.
Very similar to Leicester City shit one season next running something like an extra 3k per game. After the title season back to being shit. Odd.

I'm sick to death of all this shit. It is clear this is a concerted WHITCH HUNT by the pl, some pl clubs, UEFA, the press/media.

If I understand some of the charges the pl are trying to charge for breaking rules that didnt exist at the time. Its fucking bonkers that the press/media arent questioning the pl for this.

I also fucking hate our press/media, pundits, commentators etc. Even yesterday at the ladies match they said that the dippers should have been dirty against us, if other words kick us. One dipper should have been sent off for a nasty studs down the Achilles. Nothing said.

Anyway City keep growing, keep investing in our great City, keep investing in our stadium, more and more kiddies around here are in City shirts.

City are innocent but the pl have to find something so it will be the non cooperation. Hope City tell them to shove it up their arse.

Rant over:)
Click to expand...
That's how to rant ;)
 
have they charged Chelsea yet?
why its taking PL long long time when Uefa already dealt with it?
(self reported shady things by Chelsea owners dating back to Abra's strange payments, agent fees, offshore tricks etc)

thats before current psr numbers also heavily under risk due to enermous spending by Boehly which would lso result in a charge like Everton's at the very least. and probably only softened so far due to to laughable 8/9 year long contract handed out to reduce amortisation fees overall.
I do hope likes of Enzo, Caicedo will have to stay at Chelsea for 8 more years and have no better seasons than current one. :)
 
Damanino said:
have they charged Chelsea yet?
why its taking PL long long time when Uefa already dealt with it?
(self reported shady things by Chelsea owners dating back to Abra's strange payments, agent fees, offshore tricks etc)

thats before current psr numbers also heavily under risk due to enermous spending by Boehly which would lso result in a charge like Everton's at the very least. and probably only softened so far due to to laughable 8/9 year long contract handed out to reduce amortisation fees overall.
I do hope likes of Enzo, Caicedo will have to stay at Chelsea for 8 more years and have no better seasons than current one. :)
Click to expand...
UEFA dealt with what Chelsea told them about which is "historical" so would be quick. Presumably the PL are investigating and it looks like there's more to come anyway, so like our case it's not going to be dealt with quickly. Their recent spending if it breaks PSR will be a different matter.
 
Centurions said:
UEFA dealt with what Chelsea told them about which is "historical" so would be quick. Presumably the PL are investigating and it looks like there's more to come anyway, so like our case it's not going to be dealt with quickly. Their recent spending if it breaks PSR will be a different matter.
Click to expand...

It is a tricky one for the PL. If they investigate Chelsea's historic issues, on top of ours, it really raises questions over how poor their review process is.

Ok, you could maybe argue that we cooked the books and they missed it because it was concealed fraud (assuming you are Jamie Carragher).

But if Chelsea did it too, without their noticing, then pretty much anyone else might hsve been too and their process wouldn't have flagged it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.