PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[KS55]

I don't know but I wouldn't think there was a mechanism for a club to request another is investigated, or accuse another etc.

Our one came about because of the der speigel articles claiming all sorts, and uefa opening an investigation. Which the PL then decided they needed to follow suit.

The Chelsea one came supposedly as a result of self reporting.

Other than that, there would need to be something with some sort of substance in the public domain to make them investigate.

Although 8 clubs did feel they had the right to write a letter to Uefa when our case was in the headlines, so who knows.

They wrote to CAS, asking them to allow the punishment to be actioned before the appeal. Charming, I must say.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

And did you ever see the architects plans for Anfield circulating at that time ? Looked like they had been drawn up by a 10 year old on a Commodore 64 - embarrassing 80’s graphics.

My arse they spent £50m with no construction started.

HKS were the architects and engineers for the Stanley Park Stadium and their entire turnover for their UK company only back to 2018 was less than 10m. So in all likelyhood it would be less than that in 2014/5.

I would be very surprised if LFC spent more than £1m in fees in total for something that didn't even get out of the ground. That includes planners agents etc. Definitely something fishy going on in their accounts.

 

[give it to gordon]

The PL is a private company in which all clubs own an equal share. The PL Rules form a contract between the clubs who agree to obey the rules. Also every club has signed the Owners charter which commits them to treat each other fairly.
It would therefore be possible to raise a shareholders dispute claiming that a particular club has broken the rules to the detriment of the others. Tabling a paper with the company secretary would be the normal route to raise such an issue.
Good luck with that one.

What action was taken over that letter ?

 

[jim tolmies perm]

HKS were the architects and engineers for the Stanley Park Stadium and their entire turnover for their UK company only back to 2018 was less than 10m. So in all likelyhood it would be less than that in 2014/5.

I would be very surprised if LFC spent more than £1m in fees in total for something that didn't even get out of the ground. That includes planners agents etc. Definitely something fishy going on in their accounts.

Think we should "dig baby dig"
It's fraud end of

 

[KS55]

What action was taken over that letter ?

None, of course.

 

[give it to gordon]

None, of course.

So the owners charter isnt worth the paper its written on unless you gang up on another club.

 

[horlock_was_super]

They paid £50m for him so surely they'd want at least £80 to £90m now

Whether or not he's worth that is another issue

nytid will think so

 

[horlock_was_super]

If stadium costs were included in PSR, no club could afford a new stadium.

Especially if you can CONvince the government to stump it up for you!

 

[Centurions]

What action was taken over that letter ?

None as they actually did nothing wrong. They didn't want us delaying things into the next season although if they'd just asked us directly we could have put their minds to rest and stopped them looking like a bunch of fannys.

 

[remember arthur mann]

1904

This needs updating

What Happened in 1904

What happened and who was famous in 1904? Browse important and historic events, world leaders, famous birthdays and notable deaths from the year 1904.

www.onthisday.com