PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[johnnytapia]

Who told you?

Someone who knows him very well.

 

[ancoats]

Do any of the PL financial and legal experts on this thread believe that City could reasonably request that the PL look into other clubs dubious financial dealings, the same way that City's have been intrinsically scrutinised? Or is that not possible. If that is the case why not? As a member of the PL could City not request this?

I have read reports that Liverpool 'hid' lost revenue in stadium development costs that wasn't properly accounted for just to pass FFP and that Spurs did dodgy transfer deals under rednapp that weren't disclosed in their books.

Spurs have just put out their annual revenue and another loss was made for the 4th time in a row, Does the Premier League FFP rules apply in London

 

[Norbiton]

Spurs have just put out their annual revenue and another loss was made for the 4th time in a row, Does the Premier League FFP rules apply in London

I was also wondering why nobody was suggesting this was a problem for them. Also debts of more than 600 million, though I guess the new stadium accounts for a lot of this

 

[ganganvince]

Spurs have just put out their annual revenue and another loss was made for the 4th time in a row, Does the Premier League FFP rules apply in London

Levy gets a huge bonus but pensioner's concessions stopped

 

[GOULDYBOBS]

Palmer for 100 million with included English tax looks fair value, over say 85 million for Richarlison from wish.

Not saying its right but the market is mad.

 

[chaddblue]

If Palmer is worth £100m then I think it’s time to give up on the game.

They paid £50m for him so surely they'd want at least £80 to £90m now

Whether or not he's worth that is another issue

 

[One Fan Clapping]

Do any of the PL financial and legal experts on this thread believe that City could reasonably request that the PL look into other clubs dubious financial dealings, the same way that City's have been intrinsically scrutinised? Or is that not possible. If that is the case why not? As a member of the PL could City not request this?

I have read reports that Liverpool 'hid' lost revenue in stadium development costs that wasn't properly accounted for just to pass FFP and that Spurs did dodgy transfer deals under rednapp that weren't disclosed in their books.

I don’t know who told you that mate but Liverpool paid £50m for plans to be drawn up for a new stadium.

That’s seems the going rate to me so I doubt they can be touched.

 

[meltonblue]

Spurs have just put out their annual revenue and another loss was made for the 4th time in a row, Does the Premier League FFP rules apply in London

A lot of their losses are for the stadium so they don’t count towards PSR.

 

[waspish]

A lot of their losses are for the stadium so they don’t count towards PSR.

The interests do

 

[Coatigan]

Do any of the PL financial and legal experts on this thread believe that City could reasonably request that the PL look into other clubs dubious financial dealings, the same way that City's have been intrinsically scrutinised? Or is that not possible. If that is the case why not? As a member of the PL could City not request this?

I have read reports that Liverpool 'hid' lost revenue in stadium development costs that wasn't properly accounted for just to pass FFP and that Spurs did dodgy transfer deals under rednapp that weren't disclosed in their books.

I don't know but I wouldn't think there was a mechanism for a club to request another is investigated, or accuse another etc.

Our one came about because of the der speigel articles claiming all sorts, and uefa opening an investigation. Which the PL then decided they needed to follow suit.

The Chelsea one came supposedly as a result of self reporting.

Other than that, there would need to be something with some sort of substance in the public domain to make them investigate.

Although 8 clubs did feel they had the right to write a letter to Uefa when our case was in the headlines, so who knows.