PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Luxury tax is aimed at Middle Eastern owners I assume? Lets see what twisted bollocks they come up with now. I am probably being negative though.
If this goes through, it’ll help any clubs wanting to accelerate their rise to the top 6 in the PL.

Clubs in Europe will still need to abide by UEFA PSR rules, but ones not in it yet can spend what they like and pay the PL luxury tax.
 
Interesting, if true.


This is exactly why City need to keep our case from reaching a conclusion anytime soon. The rules have never been fit for purpose. FFP to P&S to what ever else the red clubs decide. Meanwhile city are crucified at every opportunity.

1st they tried to “get us” with rules that didn’t exist then they tried to change the rules to “ entrap us” and now because it didn’t work have decided to dump the rules to allow United to spend again.

What a load of bollox. Keep it in the discovery period city and don’t let them see shit.

Awful corrupt organisation.
 
This is exactly why City need to keep our case from reaching a conclusion anytime soon. The rules have never been fit for purpose. FFP to P&S to what ever else the red clubs decide. Meanwhile city are crucified at every opportunity.

1st they tried to “get us” with rules that didn’t exist then they tried to change the rules to “ entrap up” and now because it didn’t work have decided to dump the rules to allow United to spend again.

What a load of bollox. Keep it in the discovery period city and don’t let them see shit.

Awful corrupt organisation.
I assume it has no bearing on our case as the rules at the time will continue to apply.
 
Luxury tax is aimed at Middle Eastern owners I assume? Lets see what twisted bollocks they come up with now. I am probably being negative though.

Basically, a spend what you want to to catch up (hey Mr Ratcliffe, give us 500 million).
If you spend above a certain amount (not clear, but probably based on sustainability calculations), you have to pay a tax/fine which is then shared among the PL clubs who aren't getting a luxury tax.

A copy from some US sports.
 
This is exactly why City need to keep our case from reaching a conclusion anytime soon. The rules have never been fit for purpose. FFP to P&S to what ever else the red clubs decide. Meanwhile city are crucified at every opportunity.

1st they tried to “get us” with rules that didn’t exist then they tried to change the rules to “ entrap up” and now because it didn’t work have decided to dump the rules to allow United to spend again.

What a load of bollox. Keep it in the discovery period city and don’t let them see shit.

Awful corrupt organisation.

The premier ffp rules have changed Nearly every other year since they came in! They tweaked they thinking they'll effect us, then taken rules out to suit the rags when they needed a rebuild! That time has come again where the scum need to spend 250m+ and they look to change them again fucking stinks!
 
The premier ffp rules have changed Nearly every other year since they came in! They tweaked they thinking they'll effect us, then taken rules out to suit the rags when they needed a rebuild! That time has come again where the scum need to spend 250m+ and they look to change them again fucking stinks!
please keep up Kaveh ssn will be along shortly telling the masses that FFP/PSR are fluid and alter as new learnings come to light ( cartel clubs failing )
 
Basically, a spend what you want to to catch up (hey Mr Ratcliffe, give us 500 million).
If you spend above a certain amount (not clear, but probably based on sustainability calculations), you have to pay a tax/fine which is then shared among the PL clubs who aren't getting a luxury tax.

A copy from some US sports.

US sports you say? Well, I wonder whose idea that is?

I would really like 7 clubs to vote to keep things just the way they are for a while longer. Just out of spite.
 
And also scrapping the related-party sponsors and sister club rules.

Where did you get that from?

The PL has passed a series of ever tighter RTP rules over the last 18 months, it would be very surprising to hear they were rowing back on that.


You're not mixing this up with UEFA clarifying the existing rule in their competitions that was in the news last week?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.