Brooklands Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Aug 2021
- Messages
- 393
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I'm neither mate.Is “He was quite a character” code for he was a bullshitter and an absolute wanker.
I'm neither mate.Is “He was quite a character” code for he was a bullshitter and an absolute wanker.
I’ll whisk awayYou two aren’t really bonding
I'm neither mate.
My question was a genuine one.Well certainly not the one where half of the presenters are Tory MPs.
Did they present both sides of the City charges?He is not a presenter anymore. GB News unlike msm generally presents both sides of an issue but if you prefer to be fed news rather than form your own opinion carry on with BBC & Sly.
You was just holding back to get more fish in netTolm is late to the party. I was told this by a source very close to our media team at the start of this year. But I was a bit dubious, as I've been caught out before by City talking the talk but not acting. So I sat on it but it seems there may be some substance. Let's hope so.
Tom Peck's been deleting his Twitter posts about City...
One person who formerly had a lot to say about us a few years ago, up to and around the time of the CAS verdict was Conn. I just checked his past articles and not a word about us or the charges. His output has mainly been about Michelle Mone, Gove and the PPE scandal.
Any football writing has been about Liverpool - either Hillsborough or the CL final in Paris - or the Newcastle takeover. There's nothing about our charges, which you'd think he'd be all over, or our experiences in Istanbul, as he hates UEFA. Yet there's nothing I can see on either of these. His main contribution to the CAS hearing was the pernicious lie that City chose two of the three judges. His last piece was in Jul 2020, stirring the pot about further Der Spiegel allegations just after the verdict
I wonder if City, or their lawyers, have had a strong word, which may explain why his colleagues are so vituperative?