gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
The ****’s squirming there. That’s some volte-face.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
The ****’s squirming there. That’s some volte-face.
remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Tolmie spot on yet again when he said City had started telling people to behave themselves or face legal action.
Nottingham shithouse.
Goldbridge is just a click bait bellend.
He is now not arsed with 115 because the new rules they are looking to bring in prevent united from spending the money they need to and limit them to 70/80% of their revenue.
He just wants United to dominate again, otherwise he may as well support Nottingham Forest
He is now not arsed with 115 because the new rules they are looking to bring in prevent united from spending the money they need to and limit them to 70/80% of their revenue.
He just wants United to dominate again, otherwise he may as well support Nottingham Forest
Like Projectriver said I’d be surprised if City had bothered with him but that clip and in fact the fuller video certainly looks like something has happened.
Of course city would bother with him! Like I posted before he has 2m subscribers on his YouTube and he is continually spouting anti city propaganda lies! It's people like him and the ones on X with 100 of thousands of followers who spout lies should be getting the letter of our lawyers!
That Forest fan now will shut up now because city could shut his YouTube channel down for good if he carried on as he has been doing! Money for him is more important than telling lies!
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
Love to see all these c££ts squirm lol
Bout time City hit back.
Bout time City hit back.
Not before time, hate that cnunt…….Absolutely fantastic.
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
I’m not surprised. Whether you like him or not, he’s got so many followers and subscribers that believe anything he says. He’s probably done more damage to City’s reputation than any other person.Like Projectriver said I’d be surprised if City had bothered with him but that clip and in fact the fuller video certainly looks like something has happened.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I was surprised how easily dismissed was the notion that he‘d had a letter. His reach (and potential impact) are significant. And accordingly he needed bringing to heel. Which appears to have happened.I’m not surprised. Whether you like him or not, he’s got so many followers and subscribers that believe anything he says. He’s probably done more damage to City’s reputation than any other person.
The **** looks rattled.
The Salford lad.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 565
- Team supported
- Manchester City
He really hates us which I love knowing , this could push her over the edge City with no case to answer ..
Have to say I remain unconvinced City would have said anything to him - like sending to a mouthy guy in the pub.Like Projectriver said I’d be surprised if City had bothered with him but that clip and in fact the fuller video certainly looks like something has happened.
However, I do admit the video suggests I may be wrong although after that bit there was a fair bit of discussion about the charges which is a bit of contradiction. The reference to letters could have been after one of the audience made a comment along the lines of Tolmie's tweet. It is one thing writing to a proper newspaper or broadcaster - sending to Goldbridge? So, I still really doubt it.