gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
That unique Kop humour.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
That unique Kop humour.
silvathechihuahua
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 477
- Team supported
- city
Goldbridge is probably trying to make himself look like a big player, look at me city have threatened me! When we’ve probably said nothing to him ,but some other journalists like Jordan may have had a flea in his ear and he’s got wind of it and included himself!Have to say I remain unconvinced City would have said anything to him - like sending to a mouthy guy in the pub.
However, I do admit the video suggests I may be wrong although after that bit there was a fair bit of discussion about the charges which is a bit of contradiction. The reference to letters could have been after one of the audience made a comment along the lines of Tolmie's tweet. It is one thing writing to a proper newspaper or broadcaster - sending to Goldbridge? So, I still really doubt it.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
As part of any settlement, Goldbridge should be persuaded to agree for his show to be sponsored by Etihad.
projectriver
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2007
- Messages
- 1,326
Also it doesn't appear any Goldbridge stuff has been deleted which if any specific videos were of concern he would have done. This one from 2 weeks ago is standard fare as far as I can tell. Still up
Like Projectriver said I’d be surprised if City had bothered with him but that clip and in fact the fuller video certainly looks like something has happened.
I feel like it’s more likely gold bridge follows Tolmie on twitter and has convinced himself he’s important enough for them to go after so he better get an apology in first.
he's not that bright!! Looks guilty to me! :-)I feel like it’s more likely gold bridge follows Tolmie on twitter and has convinced himself he’s important enough for them to go after so he better get an apology in first.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Also it doesn't appear any Goldbridge stuff has been deleted which if any specific videos were of concern he would have done. This one from 2 weeks ago is standard fare as far as I can tell. Still up
Doesn’t that surely depend on the scope of the LBA? Surely a claimant can choose to limit what defamatory output they seek to control. If he had to remove everything from his back catalogue about City, then the optics would not be great for the club, especially given the backstory. Far better for him to see the error of his ways. And what’s the fucking point of deleting anything these days? It will be out there anyway.
Agree. Its the future content that will be keyDoesn’t that surely depend on the scope of the LBA? Surely a claimant can choose to limit what defamatory output they seek to control. If he had to remove everything from his back catalogue about City, then the optics would not be great for the club, especially given the backstory. Far better for him to see the error of his ways. And what’s the fucking point of deleting anything these days? It will be out there anyway.
Chorleyblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 76
GlDoesn’t that surely depend on the scope of the LBA? Surely a claimant can choose to limit what defamatory output they seek to control. If he had to remove everything from his back catalogue about City, then the optics would not be great for the club, especially given the backstory. Far better for him to see the error of his ways. And what’s the fucking point of deleting anything these days? It will be out there anyway.