PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Kippaxpete]

Think it's wishful thinking, and some of those you tubers jumping on it could end up with egg on their face. I don't think it would be a good look to appear to be silencing free speech before a verdict has been reached. Afterwards Sue away. Saying that I hope the club are fighting back it seems a bit late now if true

Who's this Sue you speak of and where's she going?

 

[I'm Blue]

I refuse to believe this

Me? : )

 

[oakiecokie]

As if anything would be resolved or decided without Mike Keegan being informed first. What a first class needy cock.

Mrs Oakiecokie would be interested.

 

[Ballosteve]

As if anything would be resolved or decided without Mike Keegan being informed first. What a first class needy cock.

The guy is grade A cock womble

 

[Kippaxpete]

Letter Before Action. Why everyone has to abbreviate, acronymise, or use initialism as in this case, things is really annoying. CBA with it all.

I agree. It's very confusing for us members of the NAD, the National Dyslexic Association.

 

[Tricky_Trev]

How has all this come from some random person making a Facebook post? Firstly, I see so many blues on Twitter treating it as gospel just because it’s the kind of made up bollocks that we wish to be true, so therefore it must be true. And secondly, actual journalists commenting on it, as if it has any credibility. It’s honestly mad on everyone’s part.

Then if City actually ARE cleared, people will point back to this nonsense rumour and decide it’s now proven to have been true, even though it’s almost certainly a fabrication. A bit like when Eni Aluko said that City didn’t want Declan Rice and that we were only bidding because Arteta had phoned Pep and asked him to make a bid so that the Arsenal board offer what West Ham want (no really, she said this… on national radio). Then when City eventually pulled out, she doubled down and treated it as undeniable proof that she was correct. Same thing will happen here, the made up bollocks will be hailed as fact, then the person who posted it will become bigger than tolmie in the City online community, and will monetise a weekly podcast or something. It’s a mad world!

 

[OB1]

are we signing mido or not

Now that deal I did have inside info on.

 

[BlueRockape]

Now that deal I did have inside info on.

Tell

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

are we signing mido or not

Yes, but only because Jo is cup-tied.

 

[HelloCity]

How has all this come from some random person making a Facebook post? Firstly, I see so many blues on Twitter treating it as gospel just because it’s the kind of made up bollocks that we wish to be true, so therefore it must be true. And secondly, actual journalists commenting on it, as if it has any credibility. It’s honestly mad on everyone’s part.

Then if City actually ARE cleared, people will point back to this nonsense rumour and decide it’s now proven to have been true, even though it’s almost certainly a fabrication. A bit like when Eni Aluko said that City didn’t want Declan Rice and that we were only bidding because Arteta had phoned Pep and asked him to make a bid so that the Arsenal board offer what West Ham want (no really, she said this… on national radio). Then when City eventually pulled out, she doubled down and treated it as undeniable proof that she was correct. Same thing will happen here, the made up bollocks will be hailed as fact, then the person who posted it will become bigger than tolmie in the City online community, and will monetise a weekly podcast or something. It’s a mad world!

People believing posts like that on social media basically sums up the world we live in and how easy it is to influence people.

I’m sure if City do win then it will be held up as an example of them being correct or truthful, but ultimately it’s them putting their money on tails for the toss of a coin.

Unfortunately I’d say the vast majority of people are completely unable to decipher what’s real and what isn’t.