Eric Hitchmough
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 2,718
Yes, but only because Jo is cup-tied.are we signing mido or not
Yes, but only because Jo is cup-tied.are we signing mido or not
How has all this come from some random person making a Facebook post? Firstly, I see so many blues on Twitter treating it as gospel just because it’s the kind of made up bollocks that we wish to be true, so therefore it must be true. And secondly, actual journalists commenting on it, as if it has any credibility. It’s honestly mad on everyone’s part.
Then if City actually ARE cleared, people will point back to this nonsense rumour and decide it’s now proven to have been true, even though it’s almost certainly a fabrication. A bit like when Eni Aluko said that City didn’t want Declan Rice and that we were only bidding because Arteta had phoned Pep and asked him to make a bid so that the Arsenal board offer what West Ham want (no really, she said this… on national radio). Then when City eventually pulled out, she doubled down and treated it as undeniable proof that she was correct. Same thing will happen here, the made up bollocks will be hailed as fact, then the person who posted it will become bigger than tolmie in the City online community, and will monetise a weekly podcast or something. It’s a mad world!
The art of looking like they have actually done something, it's straight from Yes Minister it's al about the opticsIt's perfectly possible that the hearing will still go ahead for political reasons so the PL can show they've followed the process.
That, in their view at least, helps keep their hands clean.
Exactly just a smear campaign.The art of looking like they have actually done something, it's straight from Yes Minister it's al about the optics
I have always been of the opinion that the charges (or breaches) would not be proven but that was not the intension, the attention was to change the narrative about City, frame tham as cheats and that's exactly what has happened
Yes, and we’ve finally got Steed Malbranqueare we signing mido or not
I thought this keegan geezer has a strong dislike to us?
It is the same one who writes nonsense in the manny evening news?
The art of looking like they have actually done something, it's straight from Yes Minister it's al about the optics
I have always been of the opinion that the charges (or breaches) would not be proven but that was not the intension, the attention was to change the narrative about City, frame tham as cheats and that's exactly what has happened