As I previously mentioned, I don't have interaction off TS with Simon so don't know. Others have confirmed no letter.As you broadcast with the failed Crystal Palace owner, has he revealed to you if he's received one?
As I previously mentioned, I don't have interaction off TS with Simon so don't know. Others have confirmed no letter.As you broadcast with the failed Crystal Palace owner, has he revealed to you if he's received one?
Is that you 'dangling on a string' for this gimp to say something?You’ll find out on Tuesday.
Sort of. But those alleging libel have the burden. The defendant could claim "truth" and then would have the burden of proof. The disclosure process means it is very unlikely any club would ever take on a journalist and even less a Youtuber.Surely it's not a case of any recipient of a letter 'defying' the club? They are perfectly free to say anything they like about the charges and their opinion of guilt as long as they are prepared to back it up in court if required to.
I’m convinced mate this will happen… ‘So I’m not actually allowed to say what’s on the letter bla bla bla’. He’ll have a lot of people tuning into nonsense he’s making up. If I’m wrong then I’ll be glad because it shows the club are pretty much cleared however I don’t think I’ll be wrong.You’ll find out on Tuesday.
Still not proof .....
You see how annoying that is?
So for the likes of Harris and Goldbridge it's a hollow threat really?Sort of. But those alleging libel have the burden. The defendant could claim "truth" and then would have the burden of proof. The disclosure process means it is very unlikely any club would ever take on a journalist and even less a Youtuber.
Yep, he's shooting fish in a barrel on this.He is 100% on the windup
IMO (with direct experience of an analogous situation) yes.So for the likes of Harris and Goldbridge it's a hollow threat really?
He is allowed to talk about the situation tho I mean there are facts to report he is a sort of journalist I use the term very loosely so surely he has to know what we are accusing him of and what he can and cannot sayno we wont advise him on whats ok or not to say, were not his legal advisors, its just a letter confirming the intention of legal action should he continue on the course he is on,next move is his, i m not to sure what the letter gains for city, most likely would be used in court where they could say 'well he was warned and continued to slander the club' despite a written warning