PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

GortonBlue62 said:
I stated an opinion and have responded to most of the people who've disagreed.

I'll post nothing more on the subject. After all I'm not @Alan Harper's Tash, sometimes you just gotta know when to stop.

I stand by my initial verdict on Stefan's abject performance on Talksport today.
Click to expand...
Quite the snide rant you’re on today, bravo. :-)
 
Has the Forest fan shown the world his letter yet or is it just attention seeking bullshit ?
 
give it to gordon said:
The pl will be bring in a new rule that clubs can only use lawyers who charge less than £5.99 per hour
Click to expand...
Would we actually put that past them at this point? It's actually ridiculous at this point can't wait for this garbage to be over.

I'm almost at the point where Division 2 appeals more than dealing with these corrupt clowns.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
Stefan debates in courtrooms; you debate in pubs.

Context is everything.
Click to expand...
Spot on. Stefan answered the “would City settle” as a lawyer would. There’s always a risk in litigation so a lawyer would advise a client to at least consider a settlement. If the client is determined to carry on and take the risk inherent in any hearing then so be it. Jordan’s ”why would they settle if they are innocent” jibe, whilst having superficial merit, ignores commercial reality. Lawyers prefer settlement to litigation in commercial disputes wherever possible.
Jordans fast talking jibes, including nation state, who has the most money to spend on lawyers, may gain points with talksport regulars but all that counts is the outcome.
Imho Stefan was professional, Jordan as rudely overbearing as ever, but again to what extent if any the debate influenced opinions is irrelevant. Even if (hopefully when) City are exonerated either wholly or partly, those who now think City are cheats will not alter that view.
Slight digression but Jason Beer, K.C. in the post office enquiry, used the phrase “word soup” to describe Angela de whatsits corporate speak.
Jordan is an expert at word soup.
 
norman said:
Spot on. Stefan answered the “would City settle” as a lawyer would. There’s always a risk in litigation so a lawyer would advise a client to at least consider a settlement. If the client is determined to carry on and take the risk inherent in any hearing then so be it. Jordan’s ”why would they settle if they are innocent” jibe, whilst having superficial merit, ignores commercial reality. Lawyers prefer settlement to litigation in commercial disputes wherever possible.
Jordans fast talking jibes, including nation state, who has the most money to spend on lawyers, may gain points with talksport regulars but all that counts is the outcome.
Imho Stefan was professional, Jordan as rudely overbearing as ever, but again to what extent if any the debate influenced opinions is irrelevant. Even if (hopefully when) City are exonerated either wholly or partly, those who now think City are cheats will not alter that view.
Slight digression but Jason Beer, K.C. in the post office enquiry, used the phrase “word soup” to describe Angela de whatsits corporate speak.
Jordan is an expert at word soup.
Click to expand...
He is a crouton, which I understand is soup for cretin.
 
Have we been exonerated yet? Just asking for a friend. Anyway because I’m in sunny spain every twat is a dipper, tarquin,rag, or multiple’s of all and battering the twats away to a point that I don’t bother anymore just smile politely at them whilst thinking fuck the lot of yer. Champions of England champions of Europe champions of the world.
 
projectriver said:
I've had a quick listen back to the City section. Don't think I'd say anything different. Not really sure what Gorton's issue is - most likely stylistic (tough) or a lack of understanding (try to read more on the topic).
Here is the City section (along with grimace):
Click to expand...

Excellent. And well done on keeping focused when faced with constant and frankly childish interruptions. In management roles I always used the trick of waiting for the interruptor to finish, then calmly say 'If I may interrupt your interruption..?' That usually pressed home the message..

Your contributions (and those of Prestwich Blue et al) to everyone's understanding of this difficult and dangerous situation facing our club are most welcome and always illuminating.

Keep doing that voodoo that you do so well..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.