PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Three judges one appointed by Uefa, one appointed by City and one neutral to both parties. The judges were always going to fall into their appointed side’s verdict but the important one who was the neutral sided with City which tip the scales in the club’s favour.
IIRC Chair was appointed by CAS the other two were selected from the CAS pool City chose one, the other was suggested by City to UEFA who agreed Not sure how they voted
The media have wrongly accused City of selecting all the judges
 
Getting undressed and turning the light out
Foreplay is what happened when city beat the rags to an fa final against stoke, then we fucked them hard with title after title and climaxed with a treble before a nice after show relaxing 4 in a row.

Now that is proper fucked -:)
 
Last edited:
Three judges one appointed by Uefa, one appointed by City and one neutral to both parties. The judges were always going to fall into their appointed side’s verdict but the important one who was the neutral sided with City which tip the scales in the club’s favour.
They were selected rather than appointed. Big big difference.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back